Insilco Limited Files BSE Intimation for Postal Ballot Outcome on Director Appointments

2 min read     Updated on 31 Mar 2026, 09:52 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Radhika SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Insilco Limited officially filed its postal ballot outcome with BSE, confirming shareholder approval for two director appointments with 99.98% support. The company, under voluntary liquidation since 2021, successfully conducted the remote e-voting process with 4,58,89,952 votes cast representing 73.17% of outstanding shares.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
36461483

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Insilco Limited, operating under voluntary liquidation since June 25, 2021, has filed its official intimation with the Bombay Stock Exchange regarding the successful completion of its postal ballot process for director appointments. The company announced on March 30, 2026, that shareholders have approved both proposed resolutions through remote e-voting with overwhelming support.

BSE Filing and Regulatory Compliance

The company submitted its formal intimation to BSE under Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The postal ballot process was conducted in accordance with Sections 108 and 110 of the Companies Act, 2013, along with applicable rules and secretarial standards.

Filing Details: Information
BSE Scrip Code: 500211
Filing Date: March 30, 2026
Regulation: SEBI LODR Regulation 30
Company Status: Under voluntary liquidation since June 25, 2021

Approved Director Appointments

The postal ballot addressed two key appointments within the company's leadership structure, both receiving substantial shareholder approval:

Resolution Details: Specifications
Resolution 1: Ms. Shivangi Negi (DIN: 10823339) as Managing Director
Position Category: Executive Director
Term Duration: Five years (February 14, 2026 to February 13, 2031)
Resolution 2: Ms. Deepa Jha (DIN: 11515789) as Director
Resolution Type: Both Ordinary Resolutions
Business Nature: Special Business

Comprehensive Voting Results

The remote e-voting process demonstrated exceptional shareholder support across all categories. The detailed voting statistics reveal near-unanimous approval for both appointments:

Voting Metrics: Results
Total Outstanding Shares: 6,27,15,000
Total Shareholders (Cut-off date): 38,385
Members who Voted: 69
Total Votes Cast: 4,58,89,952
Voting Percentage: 73.17% of outstanding shares
Votes in Favor: 4,58,82,866 (99.98%)
Votes Against: 7,086 (0.02%)

Shareholder Category Performance

The voting pattern demonstrated strong support across different shareholder categories:

Promoter and Promoter Group:

  • Shares held: 4,58,53,315
  • Participation: 100% voting rate
  • Support: 100% votes in favor

Public - Others:

  • Shares held: 1,68,23,945
  • Votes polled: 36,637 (0.22% participation)
  • Support: 80.66% in favor, 19.34% against

Public - Institutional Holders:

  • Shares held: 37,740
  • Participation: No votes cast

Process Timeline and Oversight

The postal ballot followed a structured timeline with proper regulatory oversight:

Process Timeline: Dates
Postal Ballot Notice: February 13, 2026
Cut-off Date: February 20, 2026
Notice Distribution: February 24, 2026
Voting Period: February 27, 2026 (9:00 AM) to March 28, 2026 (5:00 PM)
Results Declaration: March 30, 2026
Scrutinizer: Nityanand Singh & Co., Company Secretaries
E-voting Platform: NSDL ( www.evoting.nsdl.com )

The scrutinizer's report confirmed that both resolutions were duly passed with requisite majority on March 28, 2026. Company Secretary Priya Singhal (ACS 50517) signed the official filing, ensuring compliance with all regulatory requirements despite the company's voluntary liquidation status.

What strategic initiatives might the newly appointed Managing Director implement to accelerate the voluntary liquidation process?

How will the appointment of new directors impact the timeline and asset distribution strategy for shareholders during liquidation?

Could this leadership restructuring signal a potential reversal of the voluntary liquidation decision or exploration of revival options?

like15
dislike