Indian Overseas Bank Receives Rs 8.24 Crore CGST Penalty Order, Plans Legal Challenge
Indian Overseas Bank received a Rs 8,23,79,584 penalty order from CGST authorities related to its SARFAESI Act enforcement proceedings in FY 2020-21. The bank disputes the penalty, arguing its statutory actions as secured creditor cannot be treated as commercial supply under GST law. IOB plans to challenge the order through legal channels and expects no financial impact.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Indian Overseas Bank has received a penalty order of Rs 8,23,79,584 from Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) authorities, which the bank disclosed under Regulation 30 of SEBI listing requirements on 30.03.2026. The penalty stems from the bank's actions during enforcement proceedings under the SARFAESI Act in FY 2020-21.
Penalty Details and Background
The order was issued by the Commissioner (in-situ), CGST, Delhi West Commissionerate under Section 74(9) of CGST Act, 2017. The penalty relates to consideration received by the bank during its statutory enforcement actions as a secured creditor under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act).
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Penalty Amount | Rs 8,23,79,584 |
| Issuing Authority | Commissioner, CGST Delhi West Commissionerate |
| Legal Provision | Section 74(9) of CGST Act, 2017 |
| Related Period | FY 2020-21 |
| Transaction Type | SARFAESI enforcement proceedings |
Nature of the Disputed Transaction
The penalty concerns the bank's possession of a building and leasehold rights in a secured asset and its subsequent transfer through e-auction to a purchaser during FY 2020-21. Indian Overseas Bank took these actions in exercise of its statutory powers under the SARFAESI Act as a secured creditor.
Bank's Position vs Authority's Stance
The bank has contested the penalty on several grounds:
- Bank's Contention: The bank argues that when acting under SARFAESI provisions, it merely enforces its security interest and facilitates transfer of secured assets, and cannot be treated as a "supplier" under GST law
- Transaction Nature: The bank maintains that the transaction is involuntary and statutory in nature, arising from enforcement proceedings rather than commercial supply
- Authority's Position: The tax department contends that all essential ingredients of "supply" under Section 7(1)(a) of CGST Act, 2017 are satisfied, citing Paragraph 2(a) of Schedule II which deems lease, tenancy or license to occupy land as supply of service
Bank's Response and Expected Impact
Indian Overseas Bank is preparing to file an appeal before the appropriate forum against the penalty order within prescribed timelines. The bank has indicated several key aspects of its response strategy:
| Aspect | Bank's Position |
|---|---|
| Legal Grounds | Adequate factual and legal grounds to substantiate position |
| Expected Outcome | Entire penalty will subside |
| Financial Impact | Nil, as bank will dispute entire penalty |
| Operational Impact | No impact expected on financial or operational activities |
Regulatory Compliance
The disclosure was made pursuant to Regulation 30 read with Schedule III of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations 2015. The bank filed the requisite Form A disclosure detailing the communication from regulatory authorities, as required under Industry Standards Note on Regulation 30 of the LODR Regulations.
The bank's Deputy General Manager and Company Secretary, Raghuram Mallela, signed the disclosure documents, confirming the information provided is true, correct and complete to the best of his knowledge and belief.
Historical Stock Returns for Indian Overseas Bank
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.17% | -0.79% | -10.04% | -17.11% | -13.02% | +93.45% |
How might this GST penalty case set a precedent for other public sector banks conducting SARFAESI enforcement proceedings?
What impact could prolonged legal proceedings have on Indian Overseas Bank's quarterly earnings and provisioning requirements?
Will this dispute prompt banks to restructure their asset recovery processes to avoid future GST complications?


































