IGI receives ESG score of 63 from NSE Sustainability for FY26
- International Gemological Institute Limited received an overall ESG score of 63 from NSE Sustainability for FY26
- The rating was independently prepared by NSE Sustainability using data available in the public domain
- The company stated it did not engage NSE Sustainability for this specific ESG rating exercise

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
International Gemological Institute Limited received an overall Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) score of 63 from NSE Sustainability Ratings & Analytics Limited for FY26.
The company informed stock exchanges that the rating was assigned pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The disclosure was made on October 16, 2026.
Independent assessment methodology
The company clarified that it did not engage NSE Sustainability for the ESG rating. Instead, NSE Sustainability independently prepared the report based on data available in the public domain. This distinction highlights that the score reflects third-party analysis of publicly accessible information rather than a direct engagement or audit process initiated by the company.
Disclosure details
| Metric | Detail |
|---|---|
| Rating Provider | NSE Sustainability Ratings & Analytics Limited |
| ESG Score | 63 |
| Fiscal Year | FY26 |
| Basis | Public domain data |
| Engagement Status | Not engaged by company |
Regulatory context
NSE Sustainability is a SEBI-registered ESG rating provider. The intimation was submitted to both BSE Limited and National Stock Exchange of India Limited. The filing serves as a formal record of the independent rating assignment under existing listing obligations.
Historical Stock Returns for International Gemological Institute
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.52% | +6.40% | +4.34% | -6.95% | -6.07% | -30.66% |
How will the independent nature of the ESG rating influence International Gemological Institute's future voluntary disclosure strategies to potentially improve its score?
What specific governance or environmental gaps in public data likely contributed to the moderate score of 63, and how might this impact institutional investor sentiment?
Will the company engage directly with NSE Sustainability or other rating agencies in FY27 to address data transparency issues highlighted by the current assessment?


































