HP Inc beats Q3 earnings, raises FY26 EPS guidance to $3.19-$3.29
- HP Inc Q3 non-GAAP EPS of $0.83 beat estimates by 20.29%
- FY26 EPS guidance raised to $3.19-$3.29 from $2.90-$3.10
- Personal Systems revenue rose 18% despite 16% volume decline
- AI PCs accounted for 46% of shipment mix in Q3FY26
- Full-year free cash flow outlook increased to $3-$3.2 billion

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
HP Inc. (NYSE: HPQ) reported third-quarter non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share of $0.83, beating the analyst estimate of $0.69 by 20.29%. The company also raised its full-year fiscal 2026 non-GAAP diluted net EPS guidance to $3.19 to $3.29, surpassing the consensus estimate of $3.04.
Despite the strong financial results, HP stock fell 8.52% to $27.93 in extended trading on Wednesday. The decline followed the after-hours release of the quarterly report.
Segment Performance
The Personal Systems segment drove top-line growth with net revenue rising 18% to $11.8 billion. Commercial Personal Systems revenue surged 22%, while Consumer Personal Systems grew 10%. However, total unit shipments declined 16%, indicating a shift toward higher average selling prices or premium product mix. AI PCs contributed 46% of the shipment mix in the quarter, aligning with the company's forecast for FY26. Management expects this mix to reach 60% to 70% in 2027 and more than 70% in 2028.
The Printing segment saw net revenue dip 2% to $3.9 billion, though it maintained a robust operating margin of 18.1%. Supplies revenue fell 3%, and total hardware units dropped 7%. Tank printer units grew 42%, reflecting strategic penetration into profit-upfront categories.
| Segment | Net Revenue (Q3FY26) | YoY Change | Operating Margin | Key Metric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personal Systems | $11.8 billion | +18% | 4.6% | AI PC mix: 46% |
| Printing | $3.9 billion | -2% | 18.1% | Tank unit growth: +42% |
What the Numbers Show
A significant divergence exists between HP Inc.'s revenue growth and volume trends in its core business. While Personal Systems revenue expanded by 18%, total unit volumes contracted by 16%. This suggests that the revenue growth is primarily driven by price increases or a shift toward higher-margin premium products rather than volume expansion. Additionally, non-GAAP operating margin contracted by 0.6 percentage points to 6.5%, despite the revenue upside, highlighting pressure on operational profitability even as sales accelerate. The company noted that gross margin was 18.8%, down year-over-year due to higher commodity costs, particularly memory and storage.
Cash Flow and Balance Sheet
HP Inc. generated $1.6 billion in free cash flow during the quarter, up 7% year-over-year. Year-to-date free cash flow exceeded $2.5 billion, well ahead of typical seasonality. The company raised its full-year fiscal 2026 free cash flow outlook to $3 billion to $3.2 billion. HP returned nearly $600 million to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases in the quarter and over $1.5 billion year-to-date. Accounts receivable days increased slightly by 3 days quarter-over-quarter to 41 days, while inventory remained flat at 73 days. The company ended the quarter within its target leverage range.
Outlook
For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, HP estimates non-GAAP diluted net EPS between $0.69 and $0.79. The company raised its full-year fiscal 2026 non-GAAP diluted net EPS forecast to a range of $3.19 to $3.29, including an estimated $0.19 favorable impact from tariff refunds. Management expects input costs to continue rising in FY27 but at a slower rate than in FY26. The Windows 11 refresh cycle is approximately 70% complete, with AI PC demand increasingly augmenting replacement cycles.
How will the anticipated rise in input costs for FY27 impact HP's ability to maintain its raised EPS guidance and operating margins?
What specific strategies is HP employing to offset the 16% decline in total unit shipments while sustaining revenue growth through premium product mix?
Could the 8.5% post-earnings stock drop indicate investor concern over the sustainability of AI PC demand beyond the current refresh cycle?

































