Himalaya Food International Initiates ₹72 Crore Arbitration Against Simplot for Machinery Non-Return
Himalaya Food International Limited has announced arbitration proceedings against Simplot at SIAC, seeking ₹72 crore damages for non-return of critical machinery as per March 2020 award. The company claims losses from production disruption during 2020-21 and 2021-22, with SGD 250,000 allocated for fast-track proceedings and authorization given for resolution within the current financial year.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Himalaya Food International Limited has disclosed its decision to initiate arbitration proceedings against Simplot, seeking substantial damages for non-compliance with a previous arbitration award. The company made this announcement through an investor disclosure dated April 7, 2026, pursuant to Regulation 30 of SEBI listing requirements.
Background of the Dispute
The current legal action stems from Simplot's failure to comply with the SIAC Final Award dated March 23, 2020. According to the award, Simplot was required to return critical machinery within 21 days, with the deadline falling on April 14, 2020. Despite the company's earlier issuance of a Notice of Dispute regarding this non-compliance, Simplot has continued to retain the machinery.
Arbitration Details and Financial Claims
Himalaya Food International is now proceeding to file a Notice of Arbitration (NOA) before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre, seeking comprehensive damages for the prolonged non-return of machinery.
| Claim Details: | Amount/Information |
|---|---|
| Total Damages Sought: | ₹72 Crore |
| Claim Period: | Financial Years 2020-21 and 2021-22 |
| Basis of Claim: | Loss of production and profits |
| Estimated Litigation Budget: | SGD 250,000 |
| Proceedings Type: | Fast-track under SIAC Rules 2025 |
The company has reserved its right to claim further compensation until the final resolution of the matter, indicating potential for additional claims beyond the current ₹72 crore demand.
Strategic Approach and Authorization
The Board of Directors has resolved to pursue the Simplot dispute towards a logical conclusion, including exploring the possibility of a global settlement. Mr. Sanjiv Kakkar has been specifically authorized to take all necessary steps to ensure efficient resolution of the matter within the current financial year.
Additionally, the company has requested SIAC to determine the value of the critical and custom-made equipment not returned by Simplot for the purpose of set-off before the Delhi High Court, suggesting parallel legal proceedings in Indian courts.
Funding and Compliance Considerations
Himalaya Food International is exploring various funding options for the litigation, including contingent fee arrangements, while ensuring compliance with applicable norms in Singapore. This approach indicates the company's commitment to pursuing the matter while managing financial risks associated with international arbitration proceedings.
The disclosure emphasizes the company's determination to recover the machinery and seek appropriate compensation for the extended period of non-compliance, which has reportedly impacted production capabilities and profitability over multiple financial years.
Historical Stock Returns for Himalaya Food International
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.90% | +29.77% | +23.83% | -2.85% | -5.13% | +14.92% |
How might the outcome of this arbitration affect Himalaya Food International's production capacity and market competitiveness in the coming quarters?
What potential impact could the SGD 250,000 litigation budget and ₹72 crore claim have on the company's cash flow and financial performance for FY 2026-27?
Could this dispute resolution set a precedent for how Indian food companies handle international equipment lease or partnership agreements?


































