Halder Venture Limited Fined ₹2.59 Lakh by BSE for Board Composition Non-Compliance
BSE imposed a ₹2.59 lakh fine on Halder Venture Limited for non-compliance with board composition requirements under Regulation 17(1) of SEBI (LODR) Regulations for the December 2025 quarter. This represents the second consecutive instance of such non-compliance. The company's board addressed the matter on March 26, 2026, noting that non-compliance lasted 44 days from October 1 to November 13, 2025, with full compliance achieved from November 14, 2025. The company has filed a waiver application and committed to stronger regulatory adherence going forward.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Halder Venture Limited has received a fine of ₹2.59 lakh from BSE for non-compliance with board composition requirements under SEBI regulations. The penalty was imposed for violations during the quarter ended December 2025, marking the second consecutive instance of such non-compliance by the company.
BSE Fine Details
BSE levied the fine under SEBI Master Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/PoD2/CIR/P/0155 dated November 11, 2024, for non-compliance with Regulation 17(1) of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The fine breakdown is as follows:
| Component: | Amount (₹) |
|---|---|
| Basic Fine: | 2,20,000 |
| GST @ 18%: | 39,600 |
| Total Fine Payable: | 2,59,600 |
The exchange has mandated payment within 15 days from February 27, 2026, warning that failure to comply could result in freezing of promoter shareholdings and potential transfer to the Z group with suspension of trading.
Board Response and Compliance Status
The company's Board of Directors addressed the matter during their meeting held on March 26, 2026. The board acknowledged this as the second consecutive quarter of non-compliance with Regulation 17(1) requirements.
According to the board's statement, the non-compliance arose following the completion of a Scheme of Amalgamation approved by NCLT with effect from January 1, 2025, which made corporate governance provisions under SEBI (LODR) Regulations applicable to the company.
Timeline of Compliance
The company provided specific details regarding the compliance timeline:
| Parameter: | Details |
|---|---|
| Non-Compliance Period: | October 1, 2025 to November 13, 2025 |
| Duration: | 44 days |
| Full Compliance Achieved: | November 14, 2025 |
| Waiver Application Filed: | March 2, 2026 |
Background and Remedial Actions
The company secretary informed the board that Halder Venture already had two independent directors with expertise in finance and audit. The delay in achieving full compliance was attributed to the company's efforts to identify a suitable independent director with marketing and business development experience.
The board confirmed that the company had been making continuous efforts to appoint the required independent director and that the delay was due to the intent to identify a suitable candidate rather than any regulatory lapse. This status was disclosed in the Integrated Governance Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2025.
Future Compliance Commitment
The board has advised taking abundant caution in future compliance with listing regulations and reaffirmed the company's commitment to strong governance and regulatory adherence. The company has filed a waiver application with BSE on March 2, 2026, seeking relief from the imposed penalty.
The fine must be remitted to BSE's designated virtual bank account, and the company is required to submit payment details in the prescribed format to ensure proper documentation of the penalty settlement.
Historical Stock Returns for Halder Venture
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.18% | +0.40% | +1.10% | -7.11% | -7.11% | -7.11% |
Will BSE approve Halder Venture's waiver application filed in March 2026, and what factors typically influence such decisions?
How might repeated governance violations affect Halder Venture's credit rating and ability to raise capital in the future?
Could this pattern of non-compliance lead to increased regulatory scrutiny of other companies that underwent similar NCLT-approved amalgamations?


































