Grasim Industries ESG score rises to 66 for FY26 from 59
- Grasim Industries received an independent ESG rating of 66 – Strong for FY26
- The score rose from 59 in FY25, reflecting a 7-point improvement
- ESG Risk Assessments & Insights Limited assigned the rating voluntarily
- The company clarified it did not engage the agency for the assessment
- Disclosure was made under Regulation 30 of SEBI Listing Regulations

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Grasim Industries disclosed an independent ESG rating of 66 – Strong for FY26, assigned by ESG Risk Assessments & Insights Limited. The score improves on the 59 recorded for FY25.
The rating agency, a SEBI-registered Category I provider, issued the assessment voluntarily via email dated August 25, 2026. Grasim stated it did not engage the agency for this evaluation and does not endorse the rating.
Regulatory Disclosure
The company made the disclosure under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. It also cited SEBI Master Circular No. HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026 dated January 30, 2026.
What the Numbers Show
The ESG score increased by 7 points year-over-year, moving from 59 in FY25 to 66 in FY26. This improvement places the company in the "Strong" category as defined by the rating agency's methodology.
| Metric | FY25 | FY26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESG Score | 59 | 66 | +7 |
The communication was signed by Neelabja Chakrabarty, Company Secretary and Compliance Officer, on August 26, 2026.
Historical Stock Returns for Grasim Industries
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.98% | -0.30% | +5.71% | +17.51% | +17.66% | +126.50% |
How might Grasim's improved ESG rating influence its cost of capital and access to green financing instruments in the upcoming fiscal year?
Given that Grasim did not engage the rating agency, will the company initiate a formal partnership with ESG Risk Assessments & Insights or other agencies for future evaluations?
What specific operational changes or sustainability initiatives contributed to the 7-point year-over-year improvement in the ESG score?


































