Dharani Finance FY26 net profit falls 34% to ₹55.5 lakh
- Net profit fell 33.8% YoY to ₹55.46 lakh for FY26
- Revenue from operations declined 1.8% to ₹139.81 lakh
- Auditors issued qualified opinion citing ₹200 lakh ICD exposure
- Related-party loans constitute 63.39% of total credit exposure
- Book closure for AGM is set from September 17 to September 23, 2026

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Dharani Finance reported a 33.8% year-on-year decline in net profit after tax (PAT) to ₹55.46 lakh for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026. The Chennai-based NBFC scheduled its 36th Annual General Meeting for September 23, 2026.
The decline in profitability coincided with a contraction in core operating income. Total revenue from operations fell 1.8% to ₹139.81 lakh from ₹142.43 lakh in FY25. Interest income, the primary revenue driver, decreased by ₹3.19 lakh to ₹78.99 lakh, offsetting a marginal rise in lease income which stood at ₹51.65 lakh.
Financial Performance
The company’s profit before tax dropped 4.1% to ₹81.07 lakh from ₹84.54 lakh in the previous fiscal. While employee benefit expenses rose significantly to ₹21.60 lakh from ₹16.91 lakh, other administrative expenses declined to ₹22.41 lakh from ₹25.57 lakh.
| Metric | FY26 | FY25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | ₹139.81 lakh | ₹142.43 lakh | -1.8% |
| Profit Before Tax | ₹81.07 lakh | ₹84.54 lakh | -4.1% |
| Net Profit After Tax | ₹55.46 lakh | ₹83.79 lakh | -33.8% |
The sharp divergence between pre-tax profit and net profit was driven by tax provisions. Current tax expense increased to ₹19.28 lakh from ₹17.85 lakh. More critically, deferred tax moved from a credit of ₹17.10 lakh in FY25 to a charge of ₹6.33 lakh in FY26, reflecting changes in temporary differences related to asset valuations.
Balance Sheet & Audit Qualification
Total assets expanded to ₹1,124.24 lakh from ₹1,018.78 lakh, largely due to an increase in loans given, which rose to ₹896.00 lakh from ₹838.44 lakh. The loan book is heavily concentrated in related-party exposures, which account for 63.39% of total credit exposure.
Statutory auditors Srivatsan & Associates issued a qualified opinion on the financial statements. The qualification centers on an inter-corporate deposit (ICD) of ₹200 lakh made to M/s. Aryav Exports Private Limited in July 2017, for which no interest has been accrued or received since. The auditors noted that if a provision were made for this outstanding balance, the company’s net owned funds would fall below the limits prescribed under Section 45-IA of the RBI Act. This casts significant doubt on the company’s ability to continue as a going concern without further capital infusion.
What the Numbers Show
The financial data reveals a structural dependency on related-party transactions that poses regulatory risk. With ₹568 lakh in loans extended to related parties constituting nearly two-thirds of the loan book, the NBFC’s asset quality is intrinsically linked to the performance of its promoter group entities. This concentration amplifies the impact of the auditor’s qualification regarding the Aryav Exports ICD, as the potential write-down directly threatens the minimum capital requirements needed to maintain its RBI registration.
Corporate Actions
The Board did not recommend any dividend for FY26, opting to retain earnings to fund future investments and strengthen the capital base. Mrs. Visalakshi Periasamy retires by rotation at the upcoming AGM and offers herself for re-appointment as a director.
Shareholders holding equity shares as on the book closure period from September 17, 2026, to September 23, 2026, will be eligible to attend the meeting.
Historical Stock Returns for Dharani Finance
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.31% | -0.23% | +10.30% | +36.71% | +14.19% | +148.28% |
How might the RBI respond to Dharani Finance's potential breach of minimum capital requirements under Section 45-IA if the Aryav Exports ICD is fully provisioned?
What specific strategies is management considering to diversify its loan book and reduce the 63% concentration in related-party exposures?
Will the company seek a capital infusion or equity raise to restore net owned funds to regulatory compliance levels ahead of the AGM?

































