Craftroot Retail Limited Issues Clarification on Q3 FY26 Limited Review Report Following Clerical Error
Craftroot Retail Limited has issued a clarification regarding its Limited Review Report for Q3 FY26, correcting a clerical error where the reporting period was incorrectly stated as March 31, 2026 instead of December 31, 2025. The company's auditors A.L. Thakkar & Co. confirmed that the error was purely administrative and did not affect the review procedures or financial results. A revised report with the correct period has been issued to replace the original document.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Craftroot Retail Limited (formerly known as Nirbhay Colours India Limited) has issued an important clarification regarding its Limited Review Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2025. The company's statutory auditors, A.L. Thakkar & Co. Chartered Accountants, identified and corrected a clerical error in the original report that had incorrectly stated the reporting period.
Error Details and Correction
The auditors discovered that due to an inadvertent clerical/typographical error, the reporting period was incorrectly mentioned as "Quarter ended March 31, 2026" in the Limited Review Report instead of the correct period "Quarter ended December 31, 2025." This error was identified in the report issued pursuant to Regulation 33 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Incorrect Period Mentioned | Quarter ended March 31, 2026 |
| Correct Period | Quarter ended December 31, 2025 |
| Error Type | Clerical/Typographical |
| Report Date | March 18, 2026 |
Auditor Confirmations
A.L. Thakkar & Co. provided comprehensive clarifications regarding the review process and the nature of the error. The auditors confirmed that the limited review procedures were duly carried out for the quarter ended December 31, 2025, in accordance with the applicable Standards on Review Engagements (SRE 2410) issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.
Key confirmations from the auditors include:
- The review was conducted exclusively for the quarter ended December 31, 2025
- Financial information considered pertains only to the December 31, 2025 period
- The error is purely clerical and does not affect review procedures performed
- No impact on the conclusion expressed in the Limited Review Report
- No changes to the financial results
UDIN and Revised Report
The auditors clarified that the Unique Document Identification Number (UDIN) mentioned in the original Limited Review Report was correctly generated for the quarter ended December 31, 2025. Since the UDIN already corresponds to the correct reporting period, no fresh UDIN is required for the revised Limited Review Report.
| Report Details | Information |
|---|---|
| Original UDIN | 26042264PRGCBZ7144 |
| Revised Report UDIN | 26042264SQWQEC5850 |
| Auditor Firm Registration | 120116W |
| Partner Membership No. | 042264 |
Regulatory Compliance
The clarification was addressed to the Board of Directors of Craftroot Retail Limited and copied to the Listing Compliance Department of BSE Limited. The company is issuing a revised Limited Review Report with the correct reporting period to rectify the clerical error, which should be read in substitution of the earlier report.
The auditors expressed regret for the inadvertent error and any inconvenience caused, emphasizing that the mistake was purely administrative and did not compromise the integrity of the review process or the accuracy of the financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2025.
Source: None/Company/INE218T01010/06ce8750-012b-463b-9a53-592c0562cae2.pdf
Historical Stock Returns for Nirbhay Colours
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Will this clerical error impact investor confidence in Craftroot Retail's internal controls and audit processes going forward?
How might this auditing mistake affect the company's relationship with regulatory authorities and future compliance scrutiny?
Could this incident lead to changes in the company's document review procedures or auditor selection for upcoming quarters?
































