BC Supreme Court confirms Seabridge KSM determination reasonable
The Supreme Court of British Columbia upheld the EAO's determination that Seabridge Gold's KSM project was substantially started as of July 24, 2024, but ordered further consultation with TSKLH. Seabridge has invested $1.2 billion in the project to date, with $208 million spent since January 2024, and will continue work during the consultation process.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The Supreme Court of British Columbia has confirmed that the BC Environmental Assessment Office's (EAO) determination regarding Seabridge Gold's KSM project was reasonable, while mandating further consultation with the Tsetsaut Skii km Lax Ha (TSKLH). The court upheld the finding that the project in northwestern British Columbia was substantially started as of July 24, 2024. The ruling requires the EAO to provide a 90-day period for TSKLH to submit written arguments before the substantial started determination is reconsidered.
The court dismissed a second petition filed by SkeenaWild Conservation Trust against the determination. Seabridge Chair and CEO Rudi Fronk stated that work at KSM would continue during the consultation process and EAO reconsideration. Fronk expressed satisfaction with the court's confirmation of the EAO determination's reasonableness and noted that permanent physical improvements at KSM have been significantly enhanced.
Financial Impact on KSM Project
Seabridge has continued to invest in the KSM project throughout the regulatory proceedings. Since applying for Substantially Started Status in January 2024, the company has incurred significant capital expenditures on permanent works.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Additional expenditures (Jan 2024 onwards) | $208 million |
| Total expenditures at KSM | $1.2 billion |
The company plans to continue executing its work plans for KSM and anticipates meeting with the EAO to receive updates on the additional consultation activities. Seabridge acknowledged the continued support of the Nisga'a and Tahltan Nations, and the Gitxsan Hereditary Chiefs Office for the project.
Project Overview
Seabridge Gold holds a 100% interest in several North American gold projects. Its principal assets include the KSM and Bronson Corridor projects located in British Columbia's Golden Triangle. The company's portfolio also features the Snowstorm project in Nevada's Getchell Gold Belt and the 3 Aces project in the Yukon.
How might the mandated 90-day consultation period with TSKLH impact the project's timeline and future capital allocation?
What are the potential risks of further legal challenges from SkeenaWild or other groups following the court's dismissal of their petition?
Could the increased expenditures on permanent works influence Seabridge's ability to secure financing for its other projects like Snowstorm or 3 Aces?
























