Biogen beats Q2 earnings, raises FY26 EPS guidance to $15.85-$16.85
Biogen delivered strong Q2 results with EPS of $3.60 and revenue of $2.736 billion, driven by growth in Spinraza, Skyclarys, and Zurzuvae. The company raised its FY26 EPS guidance to $15.85-$16.85, significantly exceeding analyst expectations.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Biogen Inc. reported second-quarter adjusted earnings per share of $3.60, surpassing the consensus estimate of $2.96, while total revenue reached $2.736 billion, exceeding expectations of $2.458 billion. Driven by strong performance across its Alzheimer's and rare disease portfolio, the company raised its fiscal 2026 adjusted earnings per share guidance to a range of $15.85-$16.85, up from the previous outlook of $15.25-$16.25. This revised guidance significantly outpaces the analyst consensus estimate of $12.83, signaling robust profitability expectations for the coming fiscal year.
The revenue increase of 3% on a reported basis (2% on a constant currency basis) was fueled by growth in key products including Leqembi, Skyclarys, and Zurzuvae, alongside contributions from the recently acquired Apellis portfolio. Management attributes the upward revision in guidance to sustained demand for high-dose Spinraza regimens and the successful integration of new assets. Biogen also announced full-year total revenue is expected to grow by a mid-single-digit percentage in FY26 compared to FY25.
Product Performance Highlights
The following table details the revenue performance of Biogen's key therapeutic assets during the second quarter:
| Product | Revenue | YoY Change | Key Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spinraza | $402 million | +2% | High-dose regimen demand |
| Vumerity | $197 million | -7% | Inventory dynamics |
| Leqembi | $184 million | - | U.S. in-market sales ~$97M |
| Skyclarys | $168 million | +29% | Reata acquisition impact |
| Zurzuvae | $71 million | +53% | Demand growth |
| Apellis Assets | $128 million | - | Syfovre and Empaveli |
Spinraza revenue rose 2% year-over-year as conversion to the high-dose regimen proceeded ahead of expectations in all launched geographies. Conversely, Vumerity revenue declined 7% due to inventory dynamics, though the first half showed 7% year-over-year growth. Leqembi generated $184 million in total revenue, with approximately $97 million from U.S. in-market sales.
Strategic Acquisitions and Pipeline
Biogen completed the acquisition of Apellis, adding Syfovre and Empaveli to its portfolio. These assets contributed $128 million in revenue during the quarter and are projected to grow at mid- to high-teens rates through 2028. Additionally, Skyclarys, acquired via the Reata deal, saw revenues jump 29% to $168 million.
In pipeline developments, Biogen shared Phase 2 data for BIIB091 in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, achieving proof-of-concept. The company also exercised an option with Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc. to obtain a worldwide exclusive license for BIIB147, an investigational antisense oligonucleotide targeting ALS, paying a one-time fee of $15 million.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between Biogen’s new guidance midpoint of approximately $16.35 and the analyst consensus of $12.83 suggests the market had underestimated the company’s near-term earnings potential. The uniform uplift of $0.60 in both the lower and upper bounds of the guidance indicates confidence across all modeled scenarios. Barclays maintained an Equal-Weight rating but raised its price target from $185 to $200, reflecting improved sentiment. Biogen shares traded higher, up 1.99% to $209.70 on Wednesday.
How might the accelerated conversion of Spinraza patients to high-dose regimens impact long-term revenue sustainability and potential pricing pressures in key geographies?
What are the specific integration risks or synergies Biogen faces as it combines the Apellis portfolio with its existing rare disease assets through 2028?
Could the significant gap between Biogen's revised EPS guidance ($15.85-$16.85) and analyst consensus ($12.83) trigger a broader re-rating of the biotech sector's valuation models?

































