Bikash Tarafdar resigns as Independent Director of Shubhlaxmi Jewel Art

1 min read     Updated on 03 Jun 2026, 08:45 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shriram SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Bikash Tarafdar resigned as Independent Director of Shubhlaxmi Jewel Art Limited effective June 2, 2026, due to personal commitments. He also stepped down from the Audit Committee and Nomination and Remuneration Committee. The company confirmed no other material reasons for the resignation.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
42002091

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Bikash Tarafdar resigned as Independent Director of Shubhlaxmi Jewel Art Limited effective from the close of business hours on June 2, 2026, due to pre-occupation and other personal and professional commitments. The resignation was intimated to the National Stock Exchange of India Limited under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. Consequently, Tarafdar stepped down from the Audit Committee, Nomination and Remuneration Committee, and any other board committees where he was a member, effective the same date.

In his resignation letter, Tarafdar confirmed pursuant to Clause 7B of Part A of Schedule III to the Listing Regulations that there are no other material reasons for his resignation other than those stated. He requested the company to complete necessary compliance formalities with the stock exchanges and file e-Form DIR-12 with the Registrar of Companies, Ahmedabad. The disclosure was signed by Managing Director Narendrasinh Jesingbhai Chauhan.

Directorships and Committee Memberships

The filing disclosed the names of listed entities where Tarafdar holds directorships. He serves as an Independent Director in four other companies, as detailed below:

Sr. No. Name
1 Avishkar Infra Realty Limited - Independent Director
2 Noble Polymers Limited - Independent Director
3 Pulsar International Limited - Independent Director
4 Patsha India Private Limited - Independent Director

Historical Stock Returns for Shubhlaxmi Jewel Art

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-4.07%+7.05%+3.97%-32.13%+39.76%+63.54%

Who will Shubhlaxmi Jewel Art appoint to fill the vacancy on the Audit Committee and other key board committees?

How will the resignation impact the company's corporate governance standards given the loss of an independent voice?

Will the market view this departure as a red flag regarding the company's internal controls or future performance?

Shubhlaxmi Jewel Art clarifies SEBI penalty disclosure timing

2 min read     Updated on 28 May 2026, 07:40 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Ashish TScanX News Team
AI Summary

SEBI imposed a ₹10 lakh penalty on Shubhlaxmi Jewel Art Limited promoters for violating SAST regulations by failing to make an open offer after a 5.82% shareholding increase in May 2023. The company clarified to the exchange that the delay in disclosure was due to late receipt of the order and confirmed no material impact on operations.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
41290423

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has imposed a monetary penalty of ₹10 lakh on the promoters of Shubhlaxmi Jewel Art Limited for violating the Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers (SAST) Regulations, 2011. The adjudication order, passed by Adjudicating Officer Amit Kapoor on May 21, 2026, penalised eight individuals for failing to make a mandatory open offer after their collective shareholding exceeded the prescribed threshold. The penalty must be paid jointly and severally by the noticees within 45 days of receiving the order. The company clarified to the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. that there is no material impact on its financials, operations, or other activities due to this order.

The regulatory action stems from the preferential allotment of 18,00,000 equity shares to Narendrasinh J Chauhan on May 08, 2023. This allotment followed the conversion of warrants approved by the board in November 2021. SEBI's examination revealed that the shareholding of the promoter and promoter group increased by 5.82% post-allotment, breaching the 5% limit specified in Regulation 3(2) of the SAST Regulations. Consequently, the promoters were required to make a public announcement of an open offer, which they failed to do.

Violation of SAST Regulations

The order identified that the promoters, deemed Persons Acting in Concert (PACs), held more than 25% of the voting rights prior to the allotment. Under Regulation 3(2), any acquirer holding such a stake cannot acquire additional shares entitling them to exercise more than 5% of voting rights in a financial year without making an open offer. The difference between pre-allotment and post-allotment voting rights is treated as the quantum of acquisition, which in this case exceeded the regulatory limit.

Particulars Prior to May 08, 2023 Post May 08, 2023
Promoter Group Shares 57,85,000 75,85,000
Promoter Group Holding (%) 65.71% 71.53%
Public Holding (%) 34.29% 28.47%

The noticees argued that the preferential allotment was undertaken to rescue the company from financial distress and benefited public shareholders, as the share price had doubled compared to the warrant issue price. They contended that there was no change of control or prejudice to public shareholders. However, the Adjudicating Officer rejected these submissions, stating that the financial intent of the transaction does not exempt compliance with the mandatory open offer requirements.

Penalty Details

SEBI imposed the penalty under Section 15H of the SEBI Act, 1992, which provides for a minimum penalty of ₹10 lakh for failure to make a public announcement or offer. The regulator noted that while no quantifiable disproportionate gain or specific loss to investors could be established, a penalty was necessary to deter future violations. The eight penalised individuals include Narendrasinh J Chauhan, Soham Narendrasinh Chauhan, Ranjitsinh Gambhirsinh Solanki, Jagrutiben N Chauhan, Jignasha Ranjitsinh Solanki, Vilasben Ashokkumar Parmar, Kajal Jitendrakumar Chauhan, and Jitendrakumar J Chauhan.

Company Clarification

In a submission to the exchange dated May 27, 2026, Shubhlaxmi Jewel Art Limited addressed the timing of its initial disclosure made on May 23, 2026. The company stated that it did not receive the official order directly from SEBI or the promoters until it was shared by Mr. Ranjitsinh. It asserted that the disclosure was submitted immediately upon receiving the information. The company further noted that it has instructed promoters and directors to immediately inform the company of any regulatory orders in the future to prevent delays.

Historical Stock Returns for Shubhlaxmi Jewel Art

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
-4.07%+7.05%+3.97%-32.13%+39.76%+63.54%

Will the promoters challenge the SEBI order in the Securities Appellate Tribunal given their defense of financial distress?

How will this regulatory action impact the company's ability to raise future capital through preferential allotments or warrant conversions?

Could SEBI initiate further proceedings regarding the alleged delay in disclosure by the company to the stock exchange?

More News on Shubhlaxmi Jewel Art

1 Year Returns:+39.76%