AstraZeneca Q2FY26 Results: Revenue rises 6% YoY, core EPS up 11%
- Total revenue rose 6% YoY in H1 2026, growing 11% when excluding generic impacts on Farxiga and Brilinta
- Oncology segment led growth with a 15% revenue increase, while BioPharmaceuticals fell 5% due to patent expiries
- Core EPS grew 11% in the first half, supported by strong operational performance and stable gross margins
- Net debt increased by $3.5 billion due to dividend payments and $3.3 billion in deal-related outflows
- Management reaffirmed its $80 billion revenue target for 2030, citing a diversified pipeline and recent Phase 3 successes

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
AstraZeneca (NASDAQ: AZN) reported a 6% increase in total revenue to $14.1 billion in the first half of 2026, driven by strong demand for innovative medicines. Excluding the impact of generics on Farxiga and Brilinta, total revenue grew 11%. Core earnings per share (EPS) rose 11% during the period.
The pharmaceutical giant reiterated its full-year guidance, expecting total revenue to increase by mid- to high-single-digit percentages and core EPS to grow by low double-digit percentages. Management expressed confidence in achieving its 2030 revenue target of $80 billion, citing the strength and diversity of its pipeline.
Segment Performance
Oncology remained the primary growth engine, with revenues increasing 15% to $14.1 billion in the first half. This was underpinned by double-digit growth in all major regions, particularly the US (18%) and Europe (16%). Key medicines Tagrisso and Calquence delivered strong performances, with Calquence generating more than $1 billion in revenue for the first time in a single quarter.
BioPharmaceuticals faced a 5% decline in total revenue, primarily due to the loss of exclusivity for Farxiga, Brilinta, and roxadustat. However, the respiratory and immunology segments showed promise with 11% growth. Rare Disease portfolio revenues grew by 11%, driven by Ultomiris and Strensiq.
| Segment | Revenue Growth (H1 2026) | Key Drivers |
|---|---|---|
| Oncology | +15% | Tagrisso, Calquence, Enhertu |
| BioPharmaceuticals | -5% | Respiratory growth offset by LOE |
| Rare Disease | +11% | Ultomiris, Strensiq |
Pipeline and R&D Updates
The company announced positive results from six key Phase 3 programs and secured 30 major market approvals. Notable approvals included Etkama in breast cancer and Bexfendi in hypertension. AstraZeneca also highlighted advancements in antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and next-generation IO bispecifics as transformative technologies supporting growth beyond 2030.
Core R&D expense increased by 6% in the first half, representing 23% of total revenue. The company initiated a comprehensive Phase 3 program for its oral GLP-1 molecule elekoglipron in obesity and type 2 diabetes.
What the Numbers Show
While top-line growth was robust at 6%, the underlying performance excluding generic impacts was significantly stronger at 11%. This divergence highlights the substantial headwind created by the loss of exclusivity for Farxiga and Brilinta, which declined 90% in the quarter due to generic entry in the US. Despite this drag, the company maintained an 83% core gross margin, demonstrating pricing power and cost discipline in its remaining portfolio.
Balance Sheet and Cash Flow
Net debt increased by around $3.5 billion in the first half, primarily reflecting the payment of the second FY2025 interim dividend and deal-related payments totaling $3.3 billion. These payments included milestones and a $1.2 billion upfront payment for the CSPC collaboration. Capital expenditure stood at $1.5 billion, with expectations for it to increase by around a third in 2026 to support new manufacturing facilities.
How will the $3.5 billion increase in net debt impact AstraZeneca's credit ratings or future capital allocation strategies, particularly regarding dividends and buybacks?
Given the 90% revenue drop for Farxiga and Brilinta due to generic entry, what specific timeline does management project for new launches to fully offset this patent cliff drag?
What are the key risks associated with the Phase 3 trials of elekoglipron, and how might potential outcomes affect the company's position in the competitive obesity and diabetes drug market?

































