Arur Footwear approves registered office shift to Himachal Pradesh
- Arur Footwear approved shifting registered office from Punjab to Himachal Pradesh at its 36th AGM.
- All five resolutions passed unanimously with 100% votes in favour from the attending promoter group.
- Only one promoter representative voted; no public shareholders attended the meeting.
- Remote e-voting was unavailable due to pending BSE approval for the new ISIN activation.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Arur Footwear Limited approved the shifting of its registered office from Punjab to Himachal Pradesh during its 36th Annual General Meeting held on September 26, 2026. The move aligns with the company's plans to reactivate its manufacturing facility in Una, Himachal Pradesh, following its rehabilitation from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
The meeting, conducted in Mohali, also saw shareholders adopt the audited financial statements for the financial year ended March 31, 2026. The Board of Directors reported no qualifications or adverse remarks in the Statutory Auditor's Report or the Secretarial Audit Report. The proceedings were held via ballot paper voting, as remote e-voting could not be facilitated due to pending listing approvals for the newly allotted ISIN.
Voting details and shareholder participation
The voting results indicate that only one member from the Promoter and Promoter Group, holding 50.10% of the total voting power represented at the meeting, was present and cast votes through physical ballot papers. No public shareholders attended the meeting either in person or through proxy.
The total number of shareholders on record was 10,625. The Promoter and Promoter Group held 18,689,825 shares, while Public Non-Institutions held 983,675 shares. Votes polled by the promoter group stood at 9,856,424, representing 52.74% of their holdings. All five resolutions passed with 100% votes in favour and zero against.
Governance and leadership updates
Shareholders reappointed Manish Kumar Gupta as a director, who retired by rotation and offered himself for reappointment. Additionally, the appointment of Mayank Ahuja as an Executive Director was approved. The Board noted that Chairman and Managing Director Pankaj Dawar addressed members on the revival of operations and the launch of new footwear brands.
Key resolutions passed
The following resolutions were passed at the AGM:
| Item | Particular | Type of Resolution | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adoption of audited financial statements for FY26 | Ordinary | Passed |
| 2 | Reappointment of Manish Kumar Gupta | Ordinary | Passed |
| 3 | Appointment of Mayank Ahuja as Executive Director | Ordinary | Passed |
| 4 | Shifting registered office from Punjab to Himachal Pradesh | Special | Passed |
| 5 | Structural alignment of Object Clause in Memorandum | Special | Passed |
Operational status and listing constraints
The company disclosed that its earlier ISIN remains suspended, while the newly allotted ISIN is yet to be activated pending BSE approval. Consequently, the post-CIRP capital structure records could not be finalized for determining the cut-off date for e-voting. The management emphasized that these procedural hurdles are being addressed to ensure full compliance with SEBI regulations.
What the Numbers Show
The voting data highlights a complete absence of public shareholder participation, with zero public attendees despite 10,625 shareholders on record. All resolutions were carried solely by the promoter group's vote, which constituted 50.10% of the voting power present. This underscores the current governance dynamic where promoter consensus drives all corporate actions during the post-CIRP rehabilitation phase.
What is the expected timeline for BSE to approve the newly allotted ISIN and reactivate trading for Arur Footwear Limited?
How will the relocation of the registered office to Himachal Pradesh impact the company's operational costs and access to local manufacturing incentives?
What specific capital infusion strategies or debt restructuring plans are in place to fund the reactivation of the Una manufacturing facility?































