Artefact Projects wins Rs 2.93 Cr NHAI order for supervision consultancy
Artefact Projects Ltd secured a Rs 2.93 Cr order from the National Highways Authority of India for supervision consultancy on the Champa-Korba Katghora section of NH-149B in Chhattisgarh. The 38-month contract, awarded in association with KCS Engineering Private Limited, involves services during the operation and maintenance stage of the 4-lane road project.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Artefact Projects Ltd has secured a supervision consultancy order worth Rs 2.93 Cr from the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI). The project entails supervision services during the operation and maintenance stage of a 4-lane road section on NH-149B in Chhattisgarh. The contract duration is set for 38 months, and the fees are exclusive of GST.
The company received the letter of award for the project, which covers the Champa-Korba Katghora section from design chainage 0.000 to 38.200 (Pkg-I). Artefact Projects Ltd is executing this project in association with M/s KCS Engineering Private Limited. The disclosure was submitted to BSE Limited under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations & Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Project Details
The following table outlines the key particulars of the order as per the regulatory disclosure:
| Sr. No. | Particulars | Details |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Name of the entity awarding order(s)/contract(s) | National Highways Authority of India |
| 2 | Whether order(s) / contract(s) is awarded to domestic/ international entity | Domestic |
| 3 | Significant terms and conditions of order(s)/contract(s) awarded, in brief | Supervision Consultancy |
| 4 | Time period, if any, associated with the order(s)/contract(s) | 38 Months |
| 5 | Broad commercial consideration or size of the order(s)/contract(s) | Rs. 2,93,05,000/- |
| 6 | Whether the promoter/ promoter group/group companies have any interest in that entity to whom the order(s)/contract(s) is awarded? | No |
| 7 | Whether the same would fall within related party transactions? | No |
The company confirmed that there are no interests from the promoter group in the awarding entity, nor does the transaction qualify as a related party transaction.
Source: https://lodr-files.dhan.co/lodr-inputs/Company/INE885B01014/7a5190e4-3d3e-4ab5-813e-3006e889f9a9.pdf
Historical Stock Returns for Artefact Projects
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.67% | +3.67% | -1.75% | -8.91% | -24.93% | +53.40% |
How will this NHAI order impact Artefact Projects' revenue and order book for the current fiscal year?
Does this win signal a stronger focus on operation and maintenance supervision contracts compared to new construction projects?
What is the expected profit margin for supervision consultancy services compared to the company's other business verticals?































