Aptus Value Housing Finance posts ₹261 Cr Q1FY27 profit on strong AUM growth
Aptus Value Housing Finance posted a 19% year-on-year increase in net profit to ₹261 crore for Q1FY27, supported by a 36% jump in disbursements and 21% AUM growth. Despite a slight rise in GNPA to 1.70%, the company maintained strong profitability with an RoE of 20.4% and stable Opex ratios.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Aptus Value Housing Finance reported a 19% year-on-year increase in consolidated net profit to ₹261 crore for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 (Q1FY27), driven by a 36% surge in disbursements to ₹1,053 crore and a 21% expansion in assets under management (AUM) to ₹13,648 crore. The housing finance company maintained robust profitability with a return on assets (RoA) of 7.8% and return on equity (RoE) of 20.4%, despite a slight sequential deterioration in asset quality due to seasonal collection pressures. The Board of Directors approved the unaudited financial results on July 31, 2026, pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Financial Performance
Consolidated net income margin grew 19% year-on-year to ₹441 crore from ₹370 crore in Q1FY26. Net profit for the quarter stood at ₹261 crore, up from ₹219 crore in the corresponding period of FY26. The company’s operational efficiency remained stable, with the operating expense (Opex) ratio holding steady at 2.7%, while credit costs were contained at 0.6%, in line with management guidance. Net spreads remained healthy at 9.0%, supporting the top-line growth.
| Metric | Q1FY27 | Q1FY26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUM (₹ Cr) | 13,648 | 11,267 | +21% |
| Disbursements (₹ Cr) | 1,053 | 775 | +36% |
| Net Income Margin (₹ Cr) | 441 | 370 | +19% |
| Net Profit (₹ Cr) | 261 | 219 | +19% |
Asset Quality and Operational Updates
Asset quality metrics showed a marginal sequential uptick in stress indicators. Gross non-performing assets (GNPA) rose to 1.70% from 1.50% year-ago, while net NPA increased to 1.29% from 1.10%. Management attributed the sequential rise in delinquencies to seasonal impacts on collection efficiency, noting that underlying credit quality remains resilient. The 30+ days past due (DPD) ratio stood at 6.87%.
Operationally, Aptus expanded its branch network by adding 33 branches during the quarter, bringing the total to 372 across Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Odisha, and Maharashtra. The company plans to add another 25 branches in Q2FY27. Strategic initiatives include discontinuing sanctions for loans below ₹7 lakh to improve portfolio quality and focusing on higher average ticket sizes. Digital adoption remains strong, with over 92% of agreements executed digitally and 94% of collections through digital channels.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between robust volume growth and stable cost ratios highlights effective scale economics. While disbursements surged 36% year-on-year, the Opex ratio remained flat at 2.7%, indicating that incremental revenue is being generated without proportional increases in operating costs. However, the rise in GNPA to 1.70% warrants monitoring, as it reflects early-stage credit stress potentially linked to the broader economic environment. The company’s confidence in achieving its FY27 AUM growth guidance of 22–24% suggests that current momentum is sustainable, provided asset quality remains within manageable limits.
Historical Stock Returns for Aptus Value Housing Finance
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -4.27% | -6.80% | -4.84% | -3.65% | -20.76% | -23.51% |
How might the strategic shift to discontinue loans below ₹7 lakh impact Aptus's market share in the affordable housing segment versus its overall portfolio yield?
What specific measures is management implementing to mitigate the seasonal collection pressures that contributed to the sequential rise in GNPA to 1.70%?
Can Aptus sustain its 22–24% AUM growth guidance for FY27 given the current macroeconomic headwinds affecting the broader housing finance sector?


































