Apple global iPhone shipments rise 13% in Q2 2026
- Global iPhone shipments rose 13% YoY in Q2 2026, driven by the iPhone 17 series
- China led regional growth with a 23% jump, outpacing the broader market
- South Korea posted the strongest growth at 35%, aided by promotions
- U.S. shipments grew 6%, supported by increased carrier trade-in subsidies
- India saw a 0.4% slip due to persistent supply constraints

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) recorded a 13% year-over-year increase in global iPhone shipments during the second quarter of 2026, according to Counterpoint Research.
The growth was fueled by the iPhone 17 series, stable pricing, and expectations of potential price increases in the third quarter that prompted early purchases.
Regional Performance Divergence
China emerged as a key growth engine, with iPhone shipments rising 23% year-over-year. This outpaced the broader Chinese smartphone market, where Android manufacturers raised prices due to higher component costs. Apple’s decision to maintain stable pricing likely contributed to this relative strength.
Europe also delivered strong results with 22% shipment growth, similarly driven by consumers bringing forward purchases ahead of anticipated price hikes.
South Korea posted the strongest growth among major markets at 35%, supported by promotions and stronger sales in April and May against an easier prior-year comparison.
| Region | Shipment Growth | Key Drivers |
|---|---|---|
| South Korea | 35% | Promotions, easier comparison |
| China | 23% | Stable pricing vs Android hikes |
| Europe | 22% | Early purchases before price hike |
| United States | 6% | Carrier trade-in subsidies |
| Japan | 6% | Standard model demand |
| India | -0.4% | Supply constraints |
U.S. and Japan Demand
U.S. iPhone shipments rose 6%, supported by aggressive carrier promotions for the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max. T-Mobile U.S. Inc. (NASDAQ: TMUS) and AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) offered trade-in subsidies of up to $1,100, an increase from $1,000 a year earlier.
Japan mirrored this performance with 6% growth, driven by demand for the standard iPhone 17 and carrier upgrade offers.
India Supply Constraints
In contrast, shipments in India slipped 0.4%. Persistent supply constraints and inventory shortages limited the availability of key iPhone models across both online and physical retail channels, hindering potential demand.
What the Numbers Show
The data reveals a clear divergence between demand drivers in mature versus emerging markets. In China and Europe, growth was primarily demand-pull, accelerated by consumer anticipation of price increases and Apple’s competitive pricing strategy against Android rivals. Conversely, India’s slight decline highlights supply-push limitations, where inventory shortages capped performance despite underlying market interest. This suggests that while pricing strategy drives volume in competitive markets, supply chain execution remains the critical bottleneck in constrained regions like India.
Stock Performance
Apple shares were trading down 0.12% at $309.51 during premarket trading on Wednesday. The stock trades 0.6% below its 20-day simple moving average of $311.50 and 0.4% below its 50-day SMA of $310.88.
However, the longer-term trend remains positive. Apple trades 3.8% above its 100-day SMA of $298.18 and 9.8% above its 200-day SMA of $281.90. The relative strength index stands at 47.95, indicating neutral momentum. The golden cross formed in September 2025 remains intact, with the 20-day SMA above the 50-day SMA.
Key resistance sits at $335. Support stands near $300.50. The 100-day SMA could provide additional support near $298.18.
How will Apple's anticipated Q3 price increases impact consumer adoption rates in Europe and China, where early buying already front-loaded demand?
What specific supply chain adjustments is Apple implementing to resolve the inventory shortages currently stifling growth in the Indian market?
Will the aggressive carrier subsidies in the U.S. and Japan sustain iPhone market share against Android competitors, or will they erode long-term profit margins?

































