AccelerateBS shareholders approve director pay hikes and borrowing powers
AccelerateBS India Limited shareholders approved the revision of remuneration for four directors, including Chairman and Managing Director Mr. Kunal Arvind Shah, and authorized the Board to borrow funds and dispose of undertakings through a postal ballot concluded on June 28, 2026. All seven resolutions were passed with a majority ranging from 99.61% to 99.90%, as reported by Scrutinizer Vikas Raju Varma.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
AccelerateBS India Limited shareholders have approved the revision of remuneration for its top executives and granted the Board expanded financial powers through a postal ballot that concluded on June 28, 2026. The resolutions, passed via special resolution, authorize the company to revise the pay of four directors, including Chairman and Managing Director Mr. Kunal Arvind Shah, and permit the Board to borrow funds and dispose of undertakings. The voting results were submitted to BSE Limited on June 30, 2026, by Jigyasha Jain, Company Secretary and Compliance Officer.
The postal ballot sought shareholder approval for seven items. The first four resolutions concerned the revision of remuneration for Mr. Kunal Arvind Shah, Mr. Keyur Dipakkumar Shah (Whole-time Director), Ms. Ami Keyur Shah (Executive Director and CFO), and Ms. Ishani Kunal Shah (Executive Director and Solution Architect). The remaining resolutions authorized the Board to borrow money under Section 180(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, sell or otherwise dispose of the company's undertaking under Section 180(1)(a), and provide loans, guarantees, or investments exceeding prescribed limits under Section 186.
Vikas Raju Varma, a Practicing Company Secretary appointed as the Scrutinizer, reported that the remote e-voting period commenced on May 30, 2026, and ended on June 28, 2026. A total of 3,438,080 shares were eligible for voting as on the cut-off date of May 22, 2026. The Scrutinizer's report confirmed that all resolutions were passed with the required majority, with votes cast in favour ranging from 99.61% to 99.90% of the valid votes polled.
The detailed voting outcomes show strong support for the management's proposals. The resolution to revise the remuneration of Mr. Kunal Arvind Shah received 1,262,080 votes in favour, representing 99.80% of valid votes, while the resolution for Mr. Keyur Dipakkumar Shah secured 1,266,560 votes in favour, also 99.80%. Resolutions regarding the remuneration of Ms. Ami Keyur Shah and Ms. Ishani Kunal Shah each received 2,476,480 votes in favour, accounting for 99.90% of the valid votes.
Voting Summary
| Resolution Description | Votes In Favour | Votes Against | % In Favour |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remuneration: Mr. Kunal Arvind Shah | 1,262,080 | 2,560 | 99.80 |
| Remuneration: Mr. Keyur Dipakkumar Shah | 1,266,560 | 2,560 | 99.80 |
| Remuneration: Ms. Ami Keyur Shah | 2,476,480 | 2,560 | 99.90 |
| Remuneration: Ms. Ishani Kunal Shah | 2,476,480 | 2,560 | 99.90 |
| Borrow Money (Section 180) | 2,478,080 | 2,560 | 99.90 |
| Dispose Undertaking (Section 180) | 2,478,080 | 2,560 | 99.90 |
| Loans, Guarantees, Investments (Section 186) | 2,471,040 | 9,600 | 99.61 |
The authorizations to borrow money and dispose of undertakings received 2,478,080 votes in favour each, with 99.90% approval. The resolution to authorize loans, guarantees, and investments in excess of limits passed with 2,471,040 votes in favour (99.61%) against 9,600 votes (0.39%). The detailed results have been posted on the company's website and the National Securities Depository Limited e-voting portal.
Historical Stock Returns for AccelerateBS
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0% | +7.41% | -20.85% | +23.50% | +1.32% | +39.16% |
How does AccelerateBS India Limited plan to utilize the expanded borrowing powers to fund future growth or acquisitions?
What specific strategic undertakings is the Board considering for disposal under the newly granted authority?
Will the revised executive remuneration structure be tied to specific performance metrics or long-term company goals?































