63 Moons Technologies has fixed September 16, 2026 as the record date for determining shareholder eligibility for the financial year 2025-26 dividend.

The company announced the date in a filing with stock exchanges on August 27, 2026. Shareholders holding equity shares on the record date will be eligible to receive the payout.

Dividend Approval Process

The actual payment of the dividend is contingent upon two key approvals:

• Consent from members at the ensuing Annual General Meeting (AGM).
• Appropriate judicial orders.

The company stated that shareholders should take this information on record. No specific dividend amount per share was disclosed in the current communication.

Corporate Governance

Hariraj Chouhan, Senior Vice President and Company Secretary of 63 Moons Technologies, signed the disclosure. The corporate office is located in Mumbai, while the registered office remains in Chennai.

63 Moons Technologies shareholders approved a material related party transaction between its wholly owned overseas subsidiary, Financial Technologies Singapore Pte. Ltd., and its domestic subsidiary, Ticker Limited. The ordinary resolution passed via postal ballot on August 22, 2026, becoming effective from August 21, 2026.

The voting process was conducted in compliance with Regulation 44 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. Scrutinizer BN & Associates confirmed the results, noting that the promoter group abstained from voting as required for related party transactions.

Voting Breakdown

Public shareholders drove the approval, with institutional holders casting unanimous support. Non-institutional public shareholders also voted overwhelmingly in favor, with only a negligible fraction opposing the resolution.

What the Numbers Show

The voting participation rate highlights a distinct engagement gap between shareholder categories. While public institutions polled votes representing 35.98% of their outstanding shares, non-institutional public shareholders participated at a significantly lower rate of 28.26%. Despite this difference in participation depth, both groups delivered near-unanimous support, with the aggregate vote in favor standing at 99.99% of all valid votes cast.