RattanIndia Power Triumphs as NCLT Dismisses REC Limited's Insolvency Petition
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in New Delhi has dismissed an insolvency petition filed by REC Limited against RattanIndia Power Limited (RPL). The tribunal ruled that Redeemable Preference Shares do not constitute a 'financial debt' under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), making REC Limited ineligible to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. This decision has no expected financial implications for RPL and removes the immediate threat of insolvency proceedings.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
RattanIndia Power Limited (RPL) has emerged victorious in a significant legal battle against REC Limited, as the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in New Delhi dismissed an insolvency petition filed against the power company.
Key Highlights
- The NCLT's New Delhi Branch dismissed a petition filed by REC Limited under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against RattanIndia Power Limited.
- REC Limited had filed the petition as a holder of Redeemable Preference Shares (RPS) of RattanIndia Power.
- The tribunal ruled that Redeemable Preference Shares do not constitute a 'financial debt' under the IBC.
- As a result, REC Limited was deemed ineligible to qualify as a 'financial creditor' to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
Legal Implications
The dismissal of the petition by the NCLT has significant legal implications for both RattanIndia Power and the broader interpretation of financial creditors under the IBC. The tribunal's decision clarifies that holders of Redeemable Preference Shares cannot be considered financial creditors under the current framework of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
Financial Impact
According to the company's disclosure, there are no expected financial implications, compensation, or penalties related to this dismissal. This outcome is likely to be viewed positively by RattanIndia Power's stakeholders, as it removes the immediate threat of insolvency proceedings.
Company's Response
RattanIndia Power Limited, in its regulatory filing, stated that the petition was dismissed on the grounds that Redeemable Preference Shares do not constitute a "financial debt" under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Consequently, REC Limited does not qualify as a "financial creditor" eligible to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 7 of the IBC.
Conclusion
This legal victory for RattanIndia Power Limited not only safeguards the company from potential insolvency proceedings but also sets a precedent regarding the status of Redeemable Preference Shareholders in the context of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The decision underscores the importance of clearly defining financial creditors and debts within the legal framework of corporate insolvency resolution.
As the power sector continues to navigate complex financial and regulatory landscapes, this ruling may have broader implications for similar cases in the future, potentially influencing how financial instruments are viewed in the context of insolvency proceedings.
Historical Stock Returns for RattanIndia Power
1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
-2.12% | -7.09% | -3.35% | +19.36% | -22.57% | +335.09% |