NewsStocksGovernment May Ease Chinese Firm Restrictions: Brokerage Analysis Reveals Sector Winners and LosersGovernment May Ease Chinese Firm Restrictions: Brokerage Analysis Reveals Sector Winners and Losers
Government reports suggest potential easing of 2020 restrictions on Chinese firms in public tenders. Jefferies and Bernstein analysis shows defence and power transmission companies face minimal impact due to security priorities, while L&T, Afcons Infrastructure, and BHEL could see highest effects from infrastructure project competition. State-owned Power Grid and NTPC may benefit from increased competition reducing costs and expediting projects.
*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Recent media reports suggesting the Indian government may ease restrictions on Chinese companies participating in public sector contracts have drawn significant attention from brokerages, with analysts identifying varying impacts across industrial segments.
Brokerage Analysis Overview
According to Jefferies, the government could relax curbs imposed in 2020 that restrict Chinese firms from participating in government tenders. The brokerage emphasizes that the impact will vary sharply by segment, with some companies facing minimal effects while others could see substantial changes to their competitive landscape.
Bernstein echoes similar views, noting it would be surprised if the government completely removes Rule 144 without safeguards. Industry checks suggest some form of relaxation is likely, potentially implemented on a segment-specific basis or with additional compliance requirements for Chinese firms.
Companies Expected to Face Limited Impact
Several sectors are anticipated to see minimal effects from any policy relaxation:
| Sector/Company | Expected Impact | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Defence Companies | Least Impact | National security considerations |
| Cummins | Limited Pressure | Sector-specific factors |
| Siemens Energy | Minimal Impact | Transmission grid security priorities |
| Hitachi Energy | Limited Effect | National security around power transmission |
Jefferies specifically highlighted that defence-related companies are likely to see the least impact from any relaxation, while power transmission companies benefit from national security priorities surrounding the transmission grid.
High-Impact Companies and Sectors
Engineering and construction companies face the most significant potential effects:
Heavy Engineering & Construction:
- Larsen & Toubro: Expected to face highest impact if Chinese bidders return to large infrastructure projects
- Afcons Infrastructure: Significant exposure to infrastructure project competition
- Bharat Heavy Electricals: High impact anticipated from increased competition
Equipment Manufacturers:
- ABB: Expected to be affected, though to a lesser extent
- CG Power: Moderate impact anticipated
Bernstein believes equipment manufacturers, particularly multinational players, are likely to be more impacted than construction companies. For Larsen & Toubro specifically, the brokerage expects the impact to be negative but only marginal.
Potential Policy Implementation
The push for easing restrictions may not originate solely from the Ministry of Power. Bernstein indicates that other ministries, including steel, are also advocating for changes. Any relaxation could be implemented through:
- Segment-specific basis implementation
- Additional compliance requirements for Chinese firms
- Gradual removal of restrictions with safeguards
Clear Beneficiaries Identified
State-owned asset owners emerge as potential winners from increased competition:
| Company | Benefit | Impact Area |
|---|---|---|
| Power Grid | Cost Reduction | Expedited project execution |
| NTPC | Competitive Advantage | Reduced project costs |
Both Power Grid and NTPC could benefit from increased competition helping expedite project execution and reduce costs, particularly beneficial for competitively bid projects. The enhanced competition could create operational efficiencies and cost advantages for these state-owned enterprises.
Market Implications
The potential policy shift represents a significant development for India's industrial landscape, with brokerages highlighting the nuanced impact across different sectors. While some companies may face increased competitive pressure, others could benefit from improved project economics and faster execution timelines.
16
