Raghav Chadha Slams Zomato CEO Over 'Miscreants' Remark as Gig Worker Debate Escalates
The gig economy debate has escalated with Raghav Chadha condemning Zomato's CEO for characterizing striking workers as 'miscreants', while former NITI Aayog CEO Amitabh Kant defends the sector's job creation potential. Despite worker strikes demanding fair pay and dignity, platforms reported record performance, highlighting tensions between rapid growth and worker welfare in India's digital economy.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The debate over India's gig economy has intensified as former NITI Aayog CEO Amitabh Kant strongly defended the sector against exploitation allegations, following nationwide strikes by gig workers. The controversy has now escalated with Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha launching a sharp attack on Zomato CEO Deepinder Goyal for characterizing striking workers as "miscreants."
Chadha's Sharp Criticism of Platform Response
Raghav Chadha condemned Zomato's response to the worker strikes, particularly targeting Goyal's characterization of delivery workers as "0.10% miscreants" behind strike-related disruptions. In a strongly-worded social media post, Chadha stated that "workers asking for fair pay are not criminals" and criticized platforms for turning "a labour demand into a law & order narrative."
| Chadha's Key Arguments | Details |
|---|---|
| Worker Characterization | "Hostages with helmets" not employees |
| Platform Response | Insulting and dangerous rhetoric |
| System Dependency | Requiring police proves system failure |
| Strike Demands | Basic dignity, fair pay, safety, predictable rules |
Chadha argued that if platforms need police intervention to keep workers operational during peak periods, it represents "an admission the system doesn't work" rather than proof of success.
Kant's Defense of Gig Economy Model
Amitabh Kant characterized criticism of the gig economy as "political, not factual," arguing that objections come from people "who have not created a single job." He emphasized the sector's massive job creation potential, noting significant projected growth.
| Employment Projections | Details |
|---|---|
| Current Gig Jobs | 7.70 million |
| Projected by 2030 | 23.50 million |
| Growth Classification | One of India's largest job-creation engines |
Kant warned that politicizing the gig economy could "hurt quick commerce, destroy jobs and push workers back into the informal sector with no rights and no safety." He specifically criticized AAP and Raghav Chadha, calling them "job killers" rather than job creators.
Platform Performance During Strikes
Despite the strikes, Zomato reported record performance during peak periods. Over 4.50 lakh delivery partners across Zomato and Blinkit achieved orders worth ₹75.00 lakh, demonstrating continued platform operations during the protest period. Platforms including Swiggy, Zomato and Magicpin reportedly saw significant order surges with negligible impact from the strikes.
| Earnings Data | Previous | Current | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Earnings per Hour | ₹92.00 | ₹103.00 | 10.90% |
Goyal emphasized that workers receive comprehensive benefits including insurance schemes, period rest days for women, income tax return filing support, pension scheme access, and emergency SOS services.
Escalating Political Tensions
The exchange between Chadha and industry leaders highlights deepening political divisions over gig economy practices. Chadha's latest comments represent a significant escalation in rhetoric, moving from policy criticism to direct confrontation with platform leadership.
| Worker Demands | Platform Response |
|---|---|
| Predictable Earnings | Characterization as "miscreants" |
| Transparent Algorithms | Law enforcement involvement |
| Minimum Safeguards | Continued operations emphasis |
| Shared Upside | Benefits package highlighting |
Industry-Wide Implications
The debate reflects deeper tensions within India's expanding gig economy as it balances rapid growth with worker welfare concerns. The escalating rhetoric between political leaders and platform executives indicates that resolution may require more structured dialogue between stakeholders.
Expert analysis suggests the controversy encompasses fundamental questions about value distribution, worker rights, and sustainable business models in India's digital economy era. The characterization of workers and their demands has become a central flashpoint in determining the future direction of gig economy regulation and worker protections.




























