Nasscom Warns Against H-1B Wage-Weighted System, Cites Talent Pipeline Risks
India's tech industry body Nasscom has raised comprehensive concerns about the Trump administration's proposed shift to a wage-weighted H-1B visa selection system, warning it could disadvantage small firms, startups, and research institutions while disrupting the critical talent pipeline for US-educated STEM graduates. The organization calls for phased implementation with adequate lead time, as a federal court simultaneously upholds the administration's decision to increase H-1B application fees to $100,000, creating additional challenges for Indian IT companies and professionals.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The Trump administration is implementing a comprehensive overhaul of the H-1B visa program, replacing the decades-old random lottery system with a merit-based selection process that prioritizes higher-skilled and higher-paid foreign workers. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced these sweeping changes on December 23, with implementation scheduled for February 27, 2026, affecting the FY 2027 H-1B cap registration season.
Nasscom Raises Comprehensive Concerns
National Association of Software and Service Companies (Nasscom), India's technology industry body, has issued a detailed statement warning of significant risks from the proposed wage-weighted H-1B visa selection system. The organization cautioned that while the intent to promote high-skill employment and protect US wages is understandable, the reform could create substantial legal, economic, and operational challenges.
| Nasscom Key Concerns | Impact Details |
|---|---|
| System Focus Shift | From "specialty occupation" to wage ranking |
| Regional Distortions | Geography-based wage variations create bias |
| SME Disadvantage | Small firms and startups face selection challenges |
| Talent Pipeline Risk | Entry-level STEM graduates affected |
| Implementation Timeline | Sudden transition increases compliance complexity |
Nasscom emphasized that assigning multiple selection entries based on wage levels risks shifting the statutory focus away from "specialty occupation" towards wage ranking, potentially leading to regional and occupational distortions. The organization noted that wage levels vary widely by geography and role, which could disadvantage employers operating with moderate but market-appropriate wage structures.
Impact on Different Employer Categories
The proposed wage-weighted system creates distinct challenges for various types of employers in the US technology ecosystem. Nasscom specifically highlighted concerns about how the new system would affect different organizational structures and their ability to secure H-1B talent.
| Affected Employer Types | Specific Challenges |
|---|---|
| Small and Mid-sized Firms | Limited ability to offer top-tier wages |
| Startups | Moderate wage structures vs. selection probability |
| Research Institutions | Academic salary scales disadvantaged |
| University-linked Employers | Educational sector wage constraints |
| Large Corporations | Increased competition for high-wage positions |
The industry body warned that Level I and Level II wage bands, which often represent entry-level roles for US-educated STEM graduates, form a critical talent pipeline. Restricting these opportunities could weaken future innovation and discourage international students from pursuing advanced education in the US.
Court Upholds Fee Increases
Simultaneously, a US federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration can proceed with its decision to increase H-1B visa application fees to $100,000. US District Judge Beryl Howell rejected arguments from the US Chamber of Commerce, determining that Trump's proclamation was issued under "an express statutory grant of authority to the President."
| Legal Development | Details |
|---|---|
| Judge | US District Judge Beryl Howell |
| Date | December 23 |
| Fee Amount | $100,000 per application |
| Legal Basis | Express statutory grant of authority |
| Challenger | US Chamber of Commerce |
The judge acknowledged the move could "inflict significant harm on American businesses and institutions of higher education," but found that Congress had provided sufficient authority for the administration's actions. At least two additional lawsuits against the H-1B visa application fee remain ongoing.
Nasscom's Implementation Recommendations
Recognizing the complexity of the proposed changes, Nasscom has called for a more measured approach to implementation. The organization stressed that a sudden transition would increase compliance complexity and disrupt established workforce planning processes across the technology sector.
| Nasscom Recommendations | Implementation Strategy |
|---|---|
| Phased Implementation | Gradual transition with adequate lead time |
| Timeline Adjustment | Deferred to later lottery cycle |
| Stakeholder Consultation | Enhanced industry engagement |
| Framework Preservation | Maintain transparent and trusted visa system |
| Confidence Maintenance | Protect US talent and investment environment |
If a wage-weighted model is pursued, Nasscom emphasized that a phased implementation with adequate lead time, potentially deferred to a later lottery cycle, would be essential to maintain confidence in the US talent and investment environment. The organization urged policymakers to preserve a transparent and trusted visa framework to sustain the strength of the US technology ecosystem.
Broader Implications for Indian IT Sector
These developments significantly impact Indian IT companies and professionals, who have historically been major beneficiaries of the H-1B program. The combination of substantially higher fees and the shift from lottery-based to merit-based selection requires companies to reconfigure their hiring strategies and business models.
Indian IT firms must now adapt to a system that prioritizes higher-skilled positions and increased compensation levels, representing a fundamental departure from the random selection process. The changes align with the Trump administration's broader immigration policies and stated goal of preventing the replacement of American workers with lower-paid foreign alternatives.



























