Trump plans new AI czar, 'AI force' as leaders urge slowdown
- Donald Trump plans to appoint a new AI adviser and create an 'AI force'
- David Sacks and Sriram Krishnan previously held or stepped down from AI roles
- Announcement precedes planned meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping
- Prominent AI figures have urged a slowdown citing control risks

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
President Donald Trump announced Saturday he intends to appoint a new artificial intelligence adviser and establish an "AI force" to oversee the sector. He offered no specifics on structure or timing for the initiative.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump stated the administration would not hinder the industry's growth but would use existing criminal and civil justice systems to address misconduct. "We will cherish it, help it, and watch over it, as it grows," he wrote.
Advisory Team Reshuffling
The appointment marks Trump's second person to serve as AI czar. Venture capitalist David Sacks held the position before departing in spring for an external advisory role. Sacks has argued that AI developers, not federal regulators, should bear responsibility for product safety.
Sriram Krishnan, the White House's senior AI policy adviser, also stepped down in June. Krishnan plans to launch an outside institution aimed at shaping AI policy.
Geopolitical Context
The announcement comes days before Trump's planned meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday. Washington and Beijing are currently competing for AI dominance.
The move also follows warnings from prominent AI figures urging a slowdown in development. These leaders cite risks that the technology could operate beyond human control.
How might the establishment of an 'AI force' impact the current regulatory framework and the balance between industry self-regulation and federal oversight?
What specific implications could this new AI advisory structure have for the upcoming US-China trade and technology negotiations?
Will the shift from David Sacks' deregulatory stance to a new appointee signal a change in the administration's approach to AI safety and liability?

























