Nasscom says Indian tech firms reduced H-1B dependence
- Nasscom states Indian tech firms significantly reduced H-1B dependence recently
- Industry body clarifies immigration and skilled talent mobility are distinct issues
- Number of employees transitioning from H-1B to permanent residency via PERM is limited

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Nasscom stated that Indian technology companies have significantly reduced their dependence on H-1B visas over the past few years. This clarification follows the U.S. suspension of the PERM process for green cards.
The industry body emphasized that it has consistently maintained that immigration and skilled talent mobility are two distinct issues. The statement addresses concerns regarding the transition from H-1B visas to permanent residency through the PERM process.
Clarification on visa transitions
Nasscom noted that the number of employees transitioning from H-1B visas to permanent residency through PERM is also limited. This point was made in the context of the recent regulatory changes in the United States.
The organization's stance highlights a strategic shift in workforce planning among Indian IT firms. By reducing reliance on specific visa categories, these companies aim to mitigate regulatory risks associated with international mobility policies.
Key takeaways
- Nasscom maintains that immigration and skilled talent mobility are separate issues.
- Indian tech companies have significantly cut their dependence on H-1B visas in recent years.
- The number of employees moving from H-1B to permanent residency via PERM is limited.
How might the reduced reliance on H-1B visas influence Indian IT firms' long-term hiring strategies and local talent acquisition costs?
What are the potential financial impacts on Indian tech companies if U.S. immigration policies tighten further regarding permanent residency pathways?
Will other global technology sectors or countries follow India's lead in diversifying their workforce mobility strategies to mitigate regulatory risks?























