Newsom, Murphy criticize Trump over $400M Qatar jet retrofit

2 min read     Updated on 22 Jun 2026, 04:24 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Anirudha BScanX News Team
AI Summary

Gov. Gavin Newsom and Sen. Chris Murphy criticized President Trump for accepting a Qatar-donated Boeing 747 and spending $400 million to retrofit it into a 'flying palace' while Americans face high inflation and gas costs. The U.S. Air Force confirmed the aircraft has joined the Presidential Airlift Group, while Trump defended the gift as necessary for proper representation. The criticism arrives alongside debates over Trump's fiscal 2027 budget, which proposes a 44% defense spending increase, and the potential $300 billion Iran reconstruction fund.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
43578393

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) and Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) criticized President Donald Trump for accepting a Qatar-donated Boeing Co. 747 aircraft and spending $400 million to retrofit it into a "flying palace" while Americans face rising costs. The criticism highlights growing scrutiny over the use of taxpayer funds for luxury upgrades amid inflation pressures and the Iran war. The U.S. Air Force confirmed the modified VC-25B Bridge aircraft has joined the Presidential Airlift Group.

Trump’s Flying Palace

In a post on X on Saturday, Newsom’s Press Office quoted Trump stating he had asked the Emir of Qatar for the "brand-new 747" because the regular Air Force One aircraft were "pretty old." Newsom countered that Trump was "laser focused on affordability" while spending $400 million on the retrofit. Trump noted that his recent trip to the G7 summit was the final planned journey on the older aircraft that have transported presidents since the 1990s. He defended the gift, arguing that refusing it would have been inappropriate and that the country must be "represented properly."

Murphy Accuses Trump of Corruption

Senator Murphy accused the President of using taxpayer-funded resources to support luxury projects. Murphy stated that taxpayers funded a plane with "a level of luxury that nobody has never seen before" and characterized the expenditures on the plane and a White House ballroom as corruption. He argued that Trump treats taxpayer money as his own for a life of luxury and reportedly intends to take the aircraft with him after leaving office.

Economic Context and Spending Priorities

The criticism comes as the Iran war has caused Americans to incur billions in excess gas costs, with air fares expected to remain high despite a ceasefire agreement. Meanwhile, the Iran Memorandum of Understanding could provide access to $300 billion in reconstruction funds. Trump’s fiscal 2027 budget proposed a 44% increase in defense spending to about $1.5 trillion while cutting non-defense programs by 10%, a move the administration stated would strengthen national security. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) also questioned funding priorities for a pool renovation and a White House ballroom amid rising costs for essentials.

Key Figure Detail
Aircraft Cost $400 million retrofit
Defense Spending Increase 44% to $1.5 trillion
Iran MoU Funds $300 billion
Qatar Jet Flying Time 800 hours

How will public perception of the $400 million retrofit impact congressional approval of the proposed 44% increase in defense spending?

What legal precedents or regulations determine whether a former president can retain access to a customized government aircraft after leaving office?

Could the scrutiny over luxury spending influence the administration's negotiation strategy for the $300 billion Iran reconstruction funds?

like18
dislike

Milliman 2026 Retiree Health Cost Index: A 65-Year-Old Couple Needs $418,000 in Savings for Healthcare in Retirement

1 min read     Updated on 22 Jun 2026, 03:44 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Radhika SScanX News Team
AI Summary

Milliman's 2026 Retiree Health Cost Index projects that a healthy 65-year-old couple retiring in 2026 needs $418,000 in savings under Medigap (+7.7% from 2025) or $211,000 under MAPD (+15.3% from 2025). Projected lifetime healthcare spending stands at $637,000 under Medigap and $320,000 under MAPD. Rising premiums, higher Part B costs, reduced supplemental benefits, and increased cost-sharing are the primary drivers of this year's increases. Despite the record single-year jump, average annual growth between 2022 and 2026 remains roughly 3% for Medigap and 2% for MAPD.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
43668842

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Milliman, Inc., a premier consulting and actuarial firm, has released its 2026 Retiree Health Cost Index (RHCI), projecting how much a healthy 65-year-old can expect to spend on healthcare throughout retirement. The index accounts for variables such as geographic location, retirement timing, and coverage selection, all of which can significantly influence total premiums and out-of-pocket expenses. This year's edition marks the largest single-year increase in the index's history, underscoring the growing financial burden of healthcare planning for retirees.

2026 Savings Projections by Coverage Type

According to the 2026 RHCI, a healthy 65-year-old couple retiring this year faces substantially different savings requirements depending on the coverage pathway chosen. The following table summarizes the key projections:

Metric: Original Medicare + Medigap Plan G + Part D Medicare Advantage + Part D (MAPD)
Required Savings (2026): $418,000 $211,000
Change from 2025: +$30,000 (+7.7%) +$28,000 (+15.3%)
Projected Lifetime Healthcare Spend: $637,000 $320,000

The Medigap pathway requires significantly higher upfront savings, while the MAPD pathway recorded a steeper percentage increase year-over-year at 15.3% compared to 7.7% for Medigap.

Factors Driving the 2026 Increases

Several distinct factors are contributing to the increases observed across both coverage pathways in 2026.

Medigap pathway drivers include:

  • Higher Medigap premiums
  • Higher Medicare Part B premiums
  • An uptick in projected long-term healthcare inflation
  • Partially offset by lower Part D premiums

MAPD pathway drivers include:

  • Premium increases across most states in 2026, reflecting rising medical costs
  • Plan adjustments following changes to Part D
  • Reduced supplemental benefits
  • Higher cost-sharing requirements driving up expected out-of-pocket costs

Longer-Term Trend Remains Moderate

Despite the sharp single-year jump, the longer-term trajectory of healthcare cost growth in retirement remains comparatively measured. Between 2022 and 2026, the Medigap pathway has recorded roughly 3% average annual growth, while the MAPD pathway has seen approximately 2% average annual growth over the same period.

"Healthcare costs in retirement don't move in a straight line, and 2026 is a good reminder of that," said Robert Schmidt, co-author of the RHCI. "Out of pocket costs are an important part of retirement planning, and how much a person spends will depend on a variety of health and other factors."

The complete 2026 Retiree Health Cost Index is available at milliman.com/retireehealthcosts.

Will the 15.3% surge in Medicare Advantage costs prompt a significant shift in enrollment toward traditional Medicare and Medigap plans?

How might the reduction in supplemental benefits and increased cost-sharing within MAPD plans impact the long-term financial solvency of the Medicare Advantage program?

Are the specific drivers of the 2026 spike, such as long-term care inflation and Part D adjustments, expected to persist into the 2027 projections?

like15
dislike
Must Read Next

Earnings

Corporate Actions

Stocks