Meta Faces $350 Million Lawsuit Over Alleged Use of Pirated Adult Content for AI Training
Meta is being sued by Strike 3 Holdings for alleged copyright infringement. The lawsuit claims Meta's IP addresses were used to download nearly 2,400 adult movies via BitTorrent, potentially for AI training. Strike 3 Holdings is seeking damages exceeding $350 million. Meta denies the allegations, calling them 'nonsensical and unsupported,' and has requested the US District Court to dismiss the case. The company argues any downloads were likely for personal use by employees or visitors, not for AI training purposes.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Meta, the tech giant behind Facebook, is embroiled in a legal battle with adult film producer Strike 3 Holdings over allegations of copyright infringement. The lawsuit, which could potentially exceed $350 million in damages, claims that Meta's corporate IP addresses were used to download nearly 2,400 adult movies via BitTorrent for training AI systems.
Lawsuit Details
Strike 3 Holdings alleges that Meta used the downloaded content to train its AI systems, including Meta Movie Gen and LLaMA. The scale of the alleged infringement is substantial:
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Number of Movies | Nearly 2,400 |
| Alleged Purpose | AI system training |
| Potential Damages | Exceeding $350 million |
| AI Systems Involved | Meta Movie Gen, LLaMA |
Meta's Response
Meta has strongly refuted these allegations, describing them as "nonsensical and unsupported." The company has taken the following actions:
- Requested the US District Court to dismiss the case
- Argued that any downloads were likely for personal use by individual employees, contractors, or visitors, not for corporate AI training
- Pointed out that its AI terms of service explicitly prohibit generating adult content
- Stated that monitoring every file downloaded across its global network would be extraordinarily complex and invasive
Broader Context
This legal challenge is part of a growing trend of lawsuits facing AI companies over the alleged use of copyrighted material for model training. The case highlights the complex issues surrounding data usage in AI development and the potential legal ramifications for tech companies.
As the lawsuit progresses, it may draw attention to the broader debate on copyright laws in the age of artificial intelligence and the responsibilities of tech companies in managing their networks and data usage.
The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the AI industry, potentially setting precedents for how companies approach data collection and usage for AI training in the future.



























