Iran's chief negotiator Qalibaf has publicly alleged that the United States is failing to uphold its commitments under the ceasefire agreement, citing two key developments as evidence of non-compliance. The statement marks a notable escalation in rhetoric from the Iranian side and underscores deepening tensions in the ongoing diplomatic process.

Qalibaf's Allegations Against the United States

Qalibaf specifically pointed to a U.S. naval blockade as a direct indicator that Washington is not adhering to the terms of the ceasefire agreement. According to his claims, the presence and operation of this naval blockade runs contrary to what was agreed upon under the ceasefire framework, raising serious questions about the implementation of the deal.

Israel's Actions in Lebanon Cited as Further Evidence

In addition to the naval blockade, Qalibaf also referenced Israel's actions in Lebanon as further proof that the U.S. is not following through on ceasefire commitments. By linking Israel's conduct in Lebanon to U.S. responsibility, the Iranian negotiator appeared to hold Washington accountable for the actions of its ally in the region.

Key Claims at a Glance

The following table summarizes the core allegations made by Qalibaf:

Implications for the Ceasefire Framework

Qalibaf's statements reflect a broader pattern of disagreement over the interpretation and execution of the ceasefire agreement. By publicly naming both a naval blockade and regional military activity as violations, the Iranian negotiating position appears to challenge the credibility of the current ceasefire arrangement. The allegations, if unaddressed, could further complicate diplomatic efforts aimed at maintaining the terms of the agreement.

On May 27, at 10:17 P.M. ET, Iran launched a ballistic missile toward Kuwait in what has been characterized as an egregious ceasefire violation by the Iranian regime. The missile was successfully intercepted by Kuwaiti air defenses, preventing any impact on Kuwaiti territory. Earlier the same day, Iranian forces also launched drone attacks in and near the Strait of Hormuz, marking multiple hostile actions within a single day — all of which were neutralized by Kuwaiti and U.S. defensive forces.

Drone Attacks Near the Strait of Hormuz

Hours before the ballistic missile launch, Iranian forces launched five one-way attack drones that posed a clear threat in and near the Strait of Hormuz. All five drones were successfully intercepted by U.S. forces operating in the region. Beyond intercepting the five attack drones, U.S. forces also took action to prevent a sixth drone launch from an Iranian ground control site located in Bandar Abbas, further underscoring the active defensive posture maintained in the region. The following table summarizes the key details of the incidents reported on May 27:

Ceasefire Violation

The ballistic missile launch toward Kuwait was explicitly described as a ceasefire violation by the Iranian regime. The sequence of events — beginning with the drone launches near the Strait of Hormuz and culminating in the ballistic missile fired at Kuwait — represented multiple hostile actions within a single day, all of which were neutralized by Kuwaiti and U.S. defensive forces.