Federal Reserve Research Suggests Tariffs May Ease Inflation Rather Than Drive Price Increases
San Francisco Federal Reserve research examining 150 years of data suggests tariffs historically coincide with rising unemployment and lower inflation, contradicting conventional economic assumptions. With US tariffs reaching 17% in the current period—the highest since 1935—the Federal Reserve cut rates by 75 basis points in 2025. However, researchers caution that today's import-dependent manufacturing sector may respond differently to trade barriers than in historical periods.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
New research from the San Francisco Federal Reserve is challenging long-held assumptions about the relationship between tariffs and inflation, suggesting that steep increases in trade barriers may actually ease price pressures rather than drive them higher. The findings come as policymakers grapple with the economic implications of significantly elevated US import duties.
Historical Analysis Reveals Unexpected Pattern
The San Francisco Fed study examined approximately 150 years of historical data from the United States, France, and the United Kingdom. The research found that large tariff increases have historically coincided with rising unemployment and downward pressure on inflation, rather than the sustained price acceleration that many economists would expect.
This analysis takes on particular significance given the current trade environment:
| Metric | Current Level | Previous Level | Historical Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average US Tariff Rate | 17% | Less than 3% (end of 2024) | Highest since 1935 |
| Fed Rate Cuts (2025) | 75 basis points | N/A | Response to softening economy |
Federal Reserve Policy Response
The Federal Reserve initially kept interest rates unchanged for much of last year due to concerns that tariffs would contribute to inflationary pressures. This caution reflected both theoretical economic models and empirical evidence suggesting that higher import costs would be passed on to consumers.
However, policy shifted by September as mounting signs of labor market weakness emerged alongside growing confidence that any inflationary impact from tariffs would prove temporary. The central bank ultimately reduced short-term borrowing costs by a total of 75 basis points in 2025 as economic momentum softened and inflation pressures continued to ease.
Modern Economy Considerations
The researchers acknowledged important limitations in applying historical patterns to today's economic landscape. The modern US manufacturing sector demonstrates far greater dependence on imported inputs compared to earlier periods, potentially making current tariffs more likely to generate cost pressures that flow through to consumer prices.
The study identified several factors that may explain why inflation historically declined during tariff episodes:
- Heightened economic uncertainty accompanying major trade policy changes
- Declines in equity markets during tariff implementation periods
- Reduced consumer confidence dampening overall demand
- Weaker asset prices offsetting direct price effects of higher import costs
Contemporary Economic Dynamics
Notably, the researchers did not assess how closely historical dynamics applied to last year's experience. While economic uncertainty rose sharply by several measures, US stock markets posted double-digit gains, supporting household spending and helping maintain overall economic growth resilience despite higher trade barriers.
Policy Implications
The findings contribute to an ongoing debate among policymakers about how tariffs influence inflation and economic growth. The research raises questions about whether central banks should treat trade-driven price pressures as temporary economic shocks rather than justification for prolonged monetary policy restraint.
The study suggests that interest rate cuts may represent an appropriate policy response if historical patterns continue to hold, though the unique characteristics of the modern economy warrant careful consideration in policy formulation.



























