Climate support strong across G7, but messaging matters
A study of 83,000 adults across six G7 countries by Potential Energy Coalition and The Rockefeller Foundation finds strong support for climate action, contingent on effective messaging. Focusing on pollution, health, and energy independence boosts support, while 'net zero' and restrictive language hinder it.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
A new study released by Potential Energy Coalition, with financial support from The Rockefeller Foundation, reveals strong support for climate solutions across six leading democracies, but highlights that the language used significantly impacts public backing. The research, titled Fixing Climate Communications, surveyed more than 83,000 adults across the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, and Canada. It found that messages focusing on shared concerns such as pollution, health, affordability, energy security, and protecting future generations increased support by more than 10 percentage points. Conversely, messages emphasizing bans, mandates, disruption, or 'net zero' consistently underperformed.
The study identifies three evidence-based principles for effective climate communication: leading with everyday consequences, making the cause concrete by framing it as pollution, and framing energy as additive rather than restrictive. After exposure to a single effective message built on these principles, support increased by at least 9 points in every country tested. The research also notes that roughly two-thirds of the global population supports immediate government action on climate change, with pro-climate messages prevailing 57% of the time in head-to-head competitions against opposition messages.
Key Findings by Country
The research provides a detailed breakdown of public opinion across the six nations surveyed, representing more than 40% of global gross domestic product (GDP) combined.
| Country | Climate Change is Real | Support Immediate Govt Action | Support Clean Energy Buildout | Top Persuader Message |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 88% | 69% | 72% | Impact of Overheating Planet (+9 pts) |
| United Kingdom | 90% | 72% | 78% | Health Risks / Protecting Nature (+9 pts) |
| France | 89% | 71% | 64% | Health Risks (+15 pts overall) |
| Germany | 85% | 62% | 62% | Impact of Overheating Planet (+11.4 pts) |
| Italy | 90% | 77% | 78% | Anti-Corporate Greed (+20 pts on right) |
| Canada | 90% | 69% | 74% | Protect What You Love (62% win rate) |
Methodology and Scope
The findings are based on two rounds of international research conducted between September and December 2025. The qualitative phase involved focus groups with 133 participants, while the quantitative phase included a national survey of approximately 42,000 respondents and a randomized controlled trial message test with approximately 41,100 respondents. The total sample size captures the views of 83,971 people worldwide. The study was commissioned by The Rockefeller Foundation's Build the Shared Future Initiative, with plans to expand research to additional countries including India, Brazil, and China in the coming months.
How will political campaigns and policymakers adjust their messaging strategies ahead of upcoming elections based on these findings?
What impact will the upcoming expansion of research to India, Brazil, and China have on global climate policy consensus?
Could the shift away from 'net zero' terminology affect corporate ESG reporting and investment strategies in the near term?

























