Redington Limited Wins GST Appeal, INR 91.74 Cr Demand Quashed
Redington Limited, a major Indian technology distributor, has won its GST appeal against a ₹91.74 crore demand for FY 2020-2021. The Joint Commissioner (ST), GST Appeals, Chennai, issued an order quashing the entire demand, which included interest and penalty. Redington stated this development has no impact on its financial or operational activities. The company disclosed this information in compliance with SEBI regulations.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Redington Limited , a prominent player in the Indian technology distribution and supply chain solutions sector, has secured a significant victory in its GST appeal. The Joint Commissioner (ST), GST Appeals, Chennai, has issued a favorable order, quashing a substantial GST demand of INR 91.74 crores for the financial year 2020-2021.
Details of the GST Appeal
The GST demand, which included interest and penalty, was originally raised by the Deputy Commissioner (CT). Redington had contested this demand, maintaining its stance on the matter. The recent ruling marks a positive outcome for the company in this tax dispute.
Key Points of the Order
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Authority | Joint Commissioner (ST), GST Appeals, Chennai |
| Order Reference | ZD331025270420Z (APL 04) |
| Order Date | October 25 |
| Financial Year Concerned | 2020-2021 |
| Original Demand Amount | INR 91.74 crores (including interest and penalty) |
| Outcome | Demand quashed entirely |
Impact on Redington Limited
Redington Limited has stated that this development has no impact on its financial, operational, or other activities. This assertion suggests that the company had not made any provisions for this potential liability in its financial statements, confident in its position during the appeal process.
Transparency and Compliance
In line with regulatory requirements, Redington Limited promptly disclosed this information to the stock exchanges. The company's communication was made in compliance with Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
This favorable ruling not only relieves Redington of a significant potential financial burden but also reinforces the company's tax compliance practices. It demonstrates the importance of due process in resolving tax disputes and highlights the potential for positive outcomes when companies contest tax demands they believe to be unjustified.
As the technology distribution landscape continues to evolve, especially in light of changing tax regulations, this ruling may set a precedent for similar cases in the industry. It underscores the need for companies to remain vigilant about their tax positions and to be prepared to defend them when necessary.
Historical Stock Returns for Redington
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.51% | -1.80% | -3.65% | +7.65% | +58.20% | +332.51% |




































