Teva study: HCPs prioritize AUSTEDO for TD treatment in older patients
- Teva data shows HCPs prioritize drowsiness risk, long-term response data, and drug interactions for TD treatment in patients aged 55+
- AUSTEDO had the highest predicted choice probability across all four patient profiles studied at Psych Congress
- Somnolence risk accounted for up to 36.2% of decision weight for outpatients previously in long-term care
- Untreated TD burden persists, with 89%-96% of registry participants experiencing mild global impact after 24 months

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Teva Pharmaceuticals announced new data from a discrete choice experiment revealing that healthcare providers (HCPs) prioritize somnolence risk and short-term symptom improvement when selecting treatments for tardive dyskinesia (TD) in patients aged 55 years or older.
The findings, presented at Psych Congress in New Orleans from September 15 – 19, 2026, indicate that AUSTEDO (deutetrabenazine) had the highest predicted choice probability across all four patient profiles studied. This preference was driven primarily by the drug’s somnolence risk profile, duration of available data demonstrating long-term response, and drug-drug interaction characteristics.
HCP Preference Driven by Tolerability and Efficacy
In the study involving 489 HCPs across various specialties, participants evaluated key attributes driving their TD treatment preferences. The data highlighted specific decision-making weights assigned to different clinical factors:
| Attribute | Decision-Making Weight Range |
|---|---|
| Somnolence (drowsiness) risk | 26.8% - 36.2% |
| Short-term symptom improvement | 24.4% - 29.5% |
| Dose formulation | 16.7% - 20.2% |
| Drug-drug interaction risk | 14.4% - 17.3% |
HCPs adapted their prescribing criteria based on patient presentation settings. The risk of somnolence carried higher priority for outpatients previously in long-term care, accounting for up to 36.2% of decision weight, compared to up to 29.5% for those currently in long-term care settings.
What the Numbers Show
Somnolence risk and short-term symptom improvement collectively account for approximately 50% to 65% of the total decision-making weight identified in the study. This concentration suggests that tolerability and immediate efficacy are the dominant drivers for VMAT2 inhibitor selection in this demographic, outweighing logistical factors like dose formulation and drug-drug interaction risks combined.
Persistent Burden of Untreated TD
Also presented at the conference, an interim analysis from the IMPACT-TD Registry examined outcomes for individuals with probable TD who remained untreated with any VMAT2 inhibitor for 24 months. The data showed that TD burden persisted without spontaneous resolution:
- Approximately 89%–96% of participants experienced at least a mild global impact of TD.
- 60%–74% experienced moderate-to-severe impact.
- Most patients (55%–69%) reported stable or worsening TD severity relative to baseline.
Depression and anxiety scores fluctuated over the two-year period without sustained improvement.
Eric Hughes, MD, PhD, Executive Vice President, Global R&D and Chief Medical Officer at Teva, stated that offering treatments with attributes valued by healthcare providers is essential for delivering effective, patient-centered care.
AUSTEDO XR and AUSTEDO are indicated in adults for the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington’s disease and for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia. Common adverse reactions include somnolence, diarrhea, dry mouth, and fatigue.
How might Teva adjust its marketing strategy for AUSTEDO to specifically highlight somnolence risk profiles when targeting prescribers of elderly outpatients versus those in long-term care?
Will competitors in the VMAT2 inhibitor market accelerate clinical trials to generate comparable long-term safety data and drug-drug interaction profiles to counter AUSTEDO's current preference advantage?
Given the high persistence of untreated TD burden, could these findings drive increased payer coverage or formulary prioritization for VMAT2 inhibitors in the 55+ demographic?




























