Supreme Court to hear Apple appeal in Epic Games app store fee battle
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear Apple's appeal of a contempt ruling in its antitrust dispute with Epic Games. The core issue is Apple's 27% fee on external payment links, which Epic argues violates a 2021 injunction. Apple claims it complied and that the order should not apply beyond Epic. Oral arguments are set for October.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear Apple's appeal of a contempt ruling tied to its long-running antitrust battle with Epic Games. The dispute centers on Apple's compliance with a 2021 injunction requiring the company to allow developers to link to alternative payment systems. At issue is Apple's policy of imposing a 27% fee on purchases made through those external links, compared to its standard 30% App Store commission.
The case stems from Epic Games' 2020 lawsuit challenging Apple's control over iOS in-app payments. While Apple largely won the underlying case, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers found the company in civil contempt for failing to fully comply with the order to allow external payment options. An appeals court upheld the contempt ruling, leading to the current Supreme Court review.
Apple denies violating the injunction and argues the order should not extend beyond Epic Games. The company has asked the court to pause enforcement of the contempt label, calling it "erroneous and prejudicial" while the appeal is considered. Apple stated in court filings that global regulators are closely watching the case as they weigh app store commission structures in other major markets.
Epic Games contends that the 27% fee structure on external links still violates the injunction. A spokesperson for Epic Games stated that lower courts have rightly found Apple's fees to be illegal and anticompetitive. Epic CEO Tim Sweeney has urged regulators in the EU, U.K., and other jurisdictions to take stronger action, arguing the case could redefine digital marketplace fees beyond the U.S.
Oral arguments are expected in the Supreme Court's next term starting in October. The outcome of the case could have significant implications for how digital marketplaces handle payment processing and commission structures globally.
| Key Figure | Detail |
|---|---|
| External Link Fee | 27% |
| Standard Commission | 30% |
| Contempt Judge | Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Next Term Start | October |
How might a Supreme Court ruling influence ongoing regulatory investigations into app store fees in the EU and UK?
If the court rules in Apple's favor, what alternative compliance strategies could developers pursue to lower payment processing costs?
Could a decision against Apple compel other digital marketplace operators to revise their own commission structures?

































