Supha Pharmachem Limited Discloses Committee of Creditors Meeting Outcomes
Supha Pharmachem Limited, currently undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), has disclosed the outcomes of its first Committee of Creditors (CoC) meeting held on April 14, 2026. The CoC approved the appointment of Raju Mangilal Marshiya as Resolution Professional, while rejecting the appointment of Rishab Sethi. The meeting also addressed various operational matters including IRP remuneration, legal advisor appointment, and budget approval for the next six months. The Interim Resolution Professional reported that the company's suspended directors have failed to cooperate in handing over control and records of the corporate debtor.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
supha pharmachem Limited, currently undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) pursuant to an order dated March 17, 2026, passed by the Hon'ble NCLT Mumbai Bench, has disclosed the outcomes of its first Committee of Creditors (CoC) meeting. The meeting was held on April 14, 2026, with e-voting concluding on April 16, 2026. The disclosure was made under Regulation 30 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015.
The CoC deliberated on ten key agenda items during the meeting, covering various aspects of the insolvency resolution process. The committee approved the ratification of the Interim Resolution Professional's remuneration and CIRP expenses incurred. In a significant development, the CoC rejected the appointment of IP Rishab Sethi as Resolution Professional, while approving the appointment of IP Raju Mangilal Marshiya for the position. Chemino Pharma Limited, representing the CoC, will file an application before the Hon'ble NCLT seeking formal appointment of Mr. Marshiya.
Key Decisions of Committee of Creditors
| S.No. | Proposed Agenda | Decision of CoC |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | To ratify the remuneration of the IRP and ratify CIRP expenses incurred | Approved |
| 2. | To appoint IP Rishab Sethi as the Resolution Professional | Rejected |
| 3. | To appoint IP Raju Mangilal Marshiya as the Resolution Professional | Approved |
| 4. | To approve appointment and fees of the legal advisor | Approved |
| 5. | To approve the appointment of 2 registered valuers as per regulation 27 of the IBC | Rejected |
| 6. | To approve corporate debtors bank account operation by the Resolution Professional | Approved |
| 7. | To authorise the Resolution Professional to hold CoC meetings at shorter notice of not less than forty-eight hours | Approved |
| 8. | To discuss and decide the intervals between each CoC meetings | Approved |
| 9. | To discuss and approve deployment of security personnel to protect corporate debtor assets | Approved |
| 10. | To approve the estimated budget for the next 6 months | Approved |
Operational Challenges
The Interim Resolution Professional, Rajesh Jhunjhunwala, highlighted significant operational challenges following the commencement of CIRP. Under Section 17(1)(b) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the powers of the Board of Directors stand suspended effective from March 17, 2026. However, the suspended directors have reportedly failed to cooperate with the IRP in taking control of the corporate debtor, its records, and requisite information. The IRP is taking necessary steps, including filing an application under Section 19(2) of the Code, to seek cooperation from the suspended directors and complete pending non-compliances in accordance with the Code and SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015.
Historical Stock Returns for Supha Pharmachem
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.17% | +28.21% | +35.14% | -67.74% | -70.06% | +78.57% |
Will the new Resolution Professional Raju Mangilal Marshiya be able to secure cooperation from the suspended directors where the previous IRP failed?
How might the rejection of registered valuers' appointment impact the asset valuation timeline and potential buyer interest in Supha Pharmachem?
What are the prospects for finding viable resolution applicants given the ongoing non-cooperation challenges and operational disruptions?


































