SRF receives ₹266.32 crore GST show cause notice for FY23-24
- SRF received a ₹266.32 crore show cause notice from CGST Vadodara-II
- Demand relates to alleged ITC disallowance for FY23 and FY24
- Cause cited: Mismatch between GST returns and portal statements
- Company states notice is not legally tenable and will contest it
- SRF asserts the matter will have no financial impact

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
SRF Limited has received a show cause notice from the Additional Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Vadodara-II Commissionerate, demanding ₹266.32 crore. The notice, issued under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, pertains to alleged Input Tax Credit disallowances for FY23 and FY24.
The regulatory filing was made to BSE and NSE on October 1, 2026, pursuant to Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The show cause notice is dated September 29, 2026.
Nature of the dispute
The tax authority alleges that certain Input Tax Credit availed by SRF is not eligible due to a mismatch between ITC claimed in statutory GST returns and ITC reflected in the auto-generated statement available on the GST portal. Consequently, a demand for GST along with applicable interest and penalty has been proposed.
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Opposing Party | Additional Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Vadodara-II Commissionerate |
| Notice Date | September 29, 2026 |
| Fiscal Years Involved | FY23, FY24 |
| Total Demand | ₹266.32 crore |
| Legal Basis | Section 73, CGST Act, 2017 |
Company response
SRF stated that it is reviewing the show cause notice and will submit an appropriate response before the concerned authority. The company maintains that the allegations are not legally tenable and intends to contest the matter before the appropriate legal forum.
Regarding financial implications, SRF asserted that the show cause notice is not sustainable and will have no financial impact. The company did not disclose any specific provisions made against this demand in the filing.
What the numbers show
The demand of ₹266.32 crore covers two fiscal years, FY23 and FY24. The company’s assertion that there will be "no financial impact" suggests either a strong confidence in its legal position or that the amount is already provisioned, though the latter is not explicitly stated in the disclosure. The mismatch cited relates specifically to the reconciliation between filed returns and the portal-generated statement, a common area of scrutiny in recent GST audits.
Historical Stock Returns for SRF
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.38% | +1.34% | -0.10% | +3.47% | -15.25% | +5.47% |
How might the outcome of SRF's legal challenge influence the broader GST compliance strategies of other large Indian industrial conglomerates?
What specific reconciliation mechanisms is SRF implementing to prevent future mismatches between filed returns and the GSTR-2A portal?
Could this high-profile dispute trigger increased scrutiny or stricter enforcement actions by the CBIC against Input Tax Credit claims across the chemical sector?

































