SKIL Infrastructure postpones 14th CoC meeting to October 27, 2026
- SKIL Infrastructure postponed its 14th Committee of Creditors meeting to October 27, 2026
- The meeting was originally scheduled for October 21, 2026 at 3:00 pm
- Postponement requested by Committee of Creditors members under CIRP proceedings
- Physical venue set at World Trade Centre, Mumbai with virtual attendance option

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
SKIL Infrastructure Limited postponed its Fourteenth Committee of Creditors meeting to Tuesday, October 27, 2026. The session, originally adjourned to October 21, will now convene at 3:00 pm in physical and virtual modes.
The resolution professional cited a request from the members of the Committee of Creditors as the reason for the postponement. The company is currently undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai bench.
Meeting logistics and venue
The physical component of the meeting will be held at Jasmine Room, 1st Floor, Centre One Building, World Trade Centre, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai. Virtual participation remains an option for creditors unable to attend in person.
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Original Date | October 21, 2026 |
| New Date | October 27, 2026 |
| Time | 3:00 pm |
| Mode | Physical and Virtual |
| Venue | WTC, Mumbai |
Regulatory context
The intimation was filed pursuant to Regulation 30 read with Schedule III of the SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations, 2015. This disclosure follows previous filings dated October 13, 2026, and October 16, 2026.
Purusottam Behera, the IBBI registered resolution professional for SKIL Infrastructure, signed the digital notice on October 21, 2026. The agenda items from the original schedule remain unchanged and will be addressed during the rescheduled session.
How will the six-day delay impact the statutory timeline for concluding the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under the NCLT?
What specific concerns among Committee of Creditors members likely triggered the request for postponement just days before the original deadline?
Could the repeated adjournments signal a lack of consensus on the resolution plan, potentially leading to liquidation proceedings?


























