Onity Group Q2FY26 Results: Revenue up 24% YoY, net loss on transaction costs
- Revenue grew 24% YoY, supported by record origination volumes and servicing additions
- Net loss included $33 million in pre-tax costs from reverse asset sales and fair value adjustments
- Origination adjusted pre-tax income rose over 3x YoY, while servicing income fell over 60%
- Total servicing UPB increased 10% YoY, outpacing the 3% industry average
- Full-year 2026 adjusted ROE guidance set at the low end of the range due to market volatility

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Onity Group Inc delivered 24% year-over-year revenue growth in the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, driven by record origination volumes and strong servicing additions. Despite top-line expansion, the company reported a net loss attributed to non-recurring transaction costs and market-driven fair value adjustments on reverse mortgage assets.
The quarter was marked by significant strategic shifts, including the completion of a reverse asset sale to Finance of America and the transfer of legacy subservicing to Rithm. These actions incurred approximately $33 million in pre-tax costs, comprising $9 million related to the transactions and $24 million from asset fair value changes. Management noted that these moves simplify the business structure and improve long-term profitability.
Operational Highlights
Origination adjusted pre-tax income increased more than three times compared to the prior year, reflecting higher industry volume levels due to lower interest rates earlier in the cycle. Funded volume reached $15.5 billion, the largest quarterly total in the company's history. Conversely, servicing adjusted pre-tax income declined by over 60% year-over-year, primarily due to a nearly 80% increase in mortgage servicing rights (MSR) runoff as interest rates fluctuated.
Total servicing unpaid principal balance (UPB) grew 10% year-over-year, outpacing the industry average of 3%. This growth was supported by $76 billion in net servicing additions, driven by organic originations and subservicing wins that exceeded first-half expectations.
Strategic Portfolio Optimization
Management emphasized three pillars for improving return on equity (ROE): servicing scale, portfolio optimization, and technology-driven productivity. The sale of 80% of the reverse MSR portfolio is expected to reduce volatility, as reverse assets historically exhibit significantly higher sensitivity to spread movements than forward MSRs.
| Metric | Q2FY26 Performance | Year-over-Year Change |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | Growth | +24% |
| Total Servicing UPB | Growth | +10% |
| Origination Adjusted Pre-tax Income | Increase | >3x |
| Servicing Adjusted Pre-tax Income | Decrease | >60% decline |
| Funded Volume | $15.5 billion | Record high |
What the Numbers Show
A divergence between operational momentum and GAAP profitability characterizes this quarter. While origination income tripled and revenue expanded 24%, the bottom line suffered from $33 million in one-time and mark-to-market charges. Notably, the $24 million fair value adjustment highlights the residual risk in the retained reverse MSR book; however, with 80% of these assets sold, future volatility from this segment should diminish. Additionally, the 10% growth in servicing UPB despite planned deboardings demonstrates the resilience of the organic origination pipeline.
Guidance Update
Citing persistent geopolitical instability and market volatility, Onity Group guided its full-year 2026 adjusted ROE to the low end of its previously stated range. The company continues to execute a share buyback program, having completed a $10 million authorization and initiated a new $20 million repurchase plan, citing shares priced materially below book value.
How will the reduced exposure to reverse mortgage assets specifically impact Onity's earnings volatility and cost of capital in the upcoming fiscal quarters?
Given the 80% surge in MSR runoff, what specific retention strategies is management implementing to mitigate further servicing attrition if interest rates remain volatile?
To what extent does the shift toward subservicing wins with partners like Rithm alter Onity's long-term margin profile compared to its legacy proprietary servicing model?




























