Nokia shares rise to $10.63 on strong AI demand and raised outlook
Nokia shares rose to $10.63 on Thursday, driven by strong Q2 results and AI infrastructure demand. Net sales grew 8% YoY to €4.82 billion, with EPS beating estimates. AI/Cloud revenue doubled, accounting for 9.3% of sales, supported by €2.8 billion in new orders. The stock remains below intermediate moving averages despite the rally.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Nokia Corp (NYSE: NOK) shares extended their rally on Thursday, rising 2.81% to $10.63, as investors continued to re-evaluate the company’s valuation based on its expanding role in artificial intelligence infrastructure. The surge followed the release of second-quarter results that exceeded consensus estimates, with management raising the full-year profit outlook. This shift in sentiment highlights Nokia’s transition beyond its traditional telecommunications identity to become a key beneficiary of the AI boom.
The company reported net sales of 4.82 billion euros ($5.60 billion) for the quarter, representing an 8% year-over-year growth. Adjusted earnings per share came in at eight cents, surpassing the expected seven cents. Network Infrastructure revenue grew by 12%, fueled by significant gains in Optical Networks (+19%) and IP Networks (+15%). These operational improvements underpin the raised guidance provided by CEO Justin Hotard.
Financial Performance Highlights
| Metric | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Net Sales | 4.82 billion euros | +8% YoY |
| Adjusted EPS | 8 cents | Beat 7 cent est. |
| Network Infra Revenue | Not specified | +12% YoY |
| Optical Networks | Not specified | +19% YoY |
| IP Networks | Not specified | +15% YoY |
A critical driver of this performance was the explosive growth in AI and Cloud revenue, which doubled (+103%) to account for 9.3% of total sales. This segment was supported by 2.8 billion euros in new AI and cloud orders. Hotard highlighted this expansion as evidence of Nokia’s increasing reach into high-growth infrastructure markets, distinct from its legacy telecom business.
Supply Chain and Strategic Outlook
Addressing potential headwinds, Hotard outlined a strategy to mitigate memory shortages expected through 2027. The plan involves securing long-term supply deals, adjusting product designs, and passing higher costs to buyers. These measures aim to protect margins amid constrained component availability.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between the overall revenue growth (8%) and the AI/Cloud segment growth (+103%) indicates a structural shift in Nokia’s revenue mix. While traditional telecom networks remain stable, the rapid adoption of AI infrastructure is becoming a material contributor to the top line, justifying the market’s re-rating of the stock despite broader market volatility (Nasdaq +1.23%, S&P 500 +0.60%).
Technical Levels
Despite the recent surge, Nokia remains below key intermediate-term moving averages. At $10.63, the stock traded about 11.5% above its 20-day simple moving average and 14.6% above its 200-day SMA. However, it remained about 9.8% below its 50-day SMA and 9.1% below its 100-day SMA.
The relative strength index stood at 52.18, a neutral reading suggesting the stock is not overbought despite the sharp gain. Nokia’s RSI reached overbought territory in May before falling to oversold levels in July. A golden cross formed in October 2025 when the 50-day SMA moved above the 200-day SMA, but the 20-day SMA remains below the 50-day SMA, leaving the shorter-term trend mixed. Key support sits near $10, a round-number level where buyers have previously stepped in.
How might Nokia's strategy to pass higher memory costs to buyers impact its competitive positioning against rivals like Ericsson and Cisco in the AI infrastructure market?
Could the rapid 103% growth in AI and Cloud revenue be sustained in the next fiscal year, or is it likely to normalize as the initial wave of infrastructure build-out matures?
What specific long-term supply deals has Nokia secured to mitigate memory shortages through 2027, and how do these agreements compare to competitors' supply chain resilience?






























