NCLT admits CIRP against Parsvnath Developers
NCLT admits CIRP against Parsvnath Developers for default of Rs. 452.34 crore. IRP appointed with restrictions pending Delhi HC appeal.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Parsvnath Developers Limited has informed the exchanges that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi Bench, has admitted a petition for the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the company. The order, dated April 30, 2026, was uploaded on the NCLT website on May 12, 2026. The petition was filed by Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd., acting as a financial creditor, under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
The admission follows a default of Rs. 452,34,19,608. Parsvnath Developers stated that the tribunal has appointed Mr. Manoj Kumar Anand as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). Mr. Anand holds registration number IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P00084/2017-18/10180.
Legal Proceedings and Restrictions
The NCLT order includes a specific restraint on the newly appointed IRP. The tribunal has directed that the IRP shall not take any precipitative steps regarding the company and its assets. This restriction is in place pending the outcome of proceedings related to an appeal filed by the company under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The appeal, registered as FAO(OS)(COMM.) 43 of 2026, is currently pending before the Division Bench of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. The matter is scheduled to be heard on May 25, 2026. The NCLT noted that the present order would abide by the outcome of the proceedings pending before the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court.
Background of the Dispute
The financial creditor, Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd., had previously assigned the debt from Sammaan Capital Limited. The tribunal observed that there was sufficient material on record to establish the disbursement of the debt and the occurrence of a default. While the company raised contentions regarding the reconciliation of loan accounts and the adjustment of amounts, the tribunal ruled that these could be considered as counter-claims at the stage of filing proof of claims during the resolution process.
| Key Details | Information |
|---|---|
| Petitioner | Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. |
| Respondent | Parsvnath Developers Limited |
| Default Amount | Rs. 452,34,19,608 |
| IRP Appointed | Mr. Manoj Kumar Anand |
| NCLT Order Date | 30.04.2026 |
| Next Hearing in HC | 25.05.2026 |
The tribunal has directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 2,00,000 with the IRP to meet immediate expenses, subject to adjustment by the Committee of Creditors. A copy of the order has been communicated to the parties involved and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI).
Historical Stock Returns for Parsvnath Developers
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -4.86% | -16.72% | -37.44% | -63.33% | -71.67% | -36.89% |
How might the Delhi High Court's ruling on the Section 37 arbitration appeal on May 25, 2026 impact the continuation or suspension of the CIRP against Parsvnath Developers?
Given Parsvnath Developers' claim of Rs. 4,696 crores already repaid across group companies, how could the resolution process affect homebuyers and other operational creditors with ongoing project commitments?
Could ARCIL's acquisition of the distressed debt from Sammaan Capital signal a broader trend of asset reconstruction companies targeting real estate developers, and what does this mean for the sector's credit landscape?


































