MRF Limited Shareholders Approve Remuneration Revisions for Five Directors
MRF Limited successfully concluded its postal ballot process with shareholders approving remuneration revisions for five key directors. The special resolution for Chairman K M Mammen received 87.45% approval, while ordinary resolutions for four other directors achieved 87.72-87.87% approval rates. Strong support came from promoter groups (100% approval) and public non-institutional shareholders (99%+ approval), with overall voting participation of 80.95% of total shareholding.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
MRF Limited shareholders have approved remuneration revisions for five key directors through a postal ballot conducted on March 28, 2026. The tire manufacturing company announced the results on March 30, 2026, confirming that all proposed resolutions were passed with requisite majority through electronic voting.
Postal Ballot Overview
The postal ballot covered remuneration revisions for five directors across one special resolution and four ordinary resolutions. The voting process was conducted entirely through remote e-voting, with participation from 80.95% of the company's total shareholding.
| Parameter: | Details |
|---|---|
| Postal Ballot Date: | March 28, 2026 |
| Total Shareholders on Record: | 51,710 |
| Total Shares Outstanding: | 4,241,143 |
| Cut-off Date: | February 20, 2026 |
| Voting Participation: | 80.95% |
Resolution Results
All five resolutions relating to director remuneration revisions were approved by shareholders. The special resolution for Chairman and Managing Director K M Mammen (DIN: 00020202) received 87.45% votes in favor, while the four ordinary resolutions for other directors achieved approval rates between 87.72% and 87.87%.
Resolution 1 - Special Resolution
The revision in remuneration terms for K M Mammen, Chairman and Managing Director, was approved with 3,002,250 votes in favor (87.45%) against 430,960 votes (12.55%). This resolution required a three-fourths majority and was successfully passed.
Ordinary Resolutions (2-5)
Four ordinary resolutions covering remuneration revisions for other directors were approved:
| Director: | Position | Votes in Favor | Approval Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arun Mammen: | Vice Chairman & MD | 3,016,849 | 87.87% |
| Rahul Mammen Mappillai: | Managing Director | 3,011,485 | 87.72% |
| Samir Thariyan Mappillai: | Whole-time Director | 3,011,478 | 87.72% |
| Varun Mammen: | Whole-time Director | 3,011,488 | 87.72% |
Voting Pattern Analysis
The voting results showed strong support from promoter and promoter group shareholders, who voted 100% in favor of all resolutions. Public non-institutional shareholders also demonstrated overwhelming support with approval rates exceeding 99% across all resolutions.
| Shareholder Category: | Shares Held | Voting Participation | Support Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promoter & Promoter Group: | 1,175,961 | 98.00% | 100% approval |
| Public - Institutions: | 1,295,051 | 88.33% | 62-64% approval |
| Public - Non Institutions: | 1,770,131 | 64.23% | 99%+ approval |
Process and Compliance
The postal ballot process was conducted in accordance with Section 108 and Section 110 of the Companies Act, 2013, and Regulation 44 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. N S Vivek, Partner at Jagannathan & Sarabeswaran, Chartered Accountants, served as the scrutinizer for the process.
The company utilized National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL) for facilitating electronic voting, with the remote e-voting facility remaining open from February 27, 2026 (9:00 AM) to March 28, 2026 (5:00 PM). No invalid votes were recorded across any of the five resolutions, indicating a smooth electronic voting process.
Historical Stock Returns for MRF
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.62% | +3.54% | -4.13% | -13.45% | +20.53% | +59.01% |
How might the revised director remuneration packages impact MRF's operational costs and profit margins in the upcoming fiscal year?
Will the significant remuneration increases signal MRF's plans for major strategic initiatives or expansion in the tire manufacturing sector?
Could the mixed voting pattern from institutional investors indicate concerns about corporate governance that might affect future investment decisions?


































