MOIL Limited Receives GST Demand Order of ₹1.27 Crore for FY 2022-23 Data Mismatches
MOIL Limited received a GST demand order of ₹1,27,68,306 from Madhya Pradesh tax authorities for alleged mismatches in GSTR-1, GSTR-3B and E-way Bill data during FY 2022-23. The demand includes IGST of ₹1,16,07,551 and penalty of ₹11,60,755, with discrepancies attributed to stock transfers, inter-unit transfers and timing differences. The company stated no immediate operational impact and plans to examine the order for potential legal action including filing an appeal.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
MOIL Limited has received a GST demand order worth ₹1,27,68,306 from tax authorities in Madhya Pradesh for alleged data mismatches during the financial year 2022-23. The order was received on March 31, 2026, at 6:40 PM from the Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Chhindwara Division, Jabalpur Zone.
GST Order Details
The order was issued in Form GST DRC-07 under Section 73 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017, addressing alleged mismatches between GSTR-1, GSTR-3B and E-way Bill data, along with Input Tax Credit (ITC) related issues for the period April 2022 to March 2023.
| Component: | Amount (₹) |
|---|---|
| IGST: | 1,16,07,551 |
| Penalty: | 11,60,755 |
| Interest: | Nil (to be computed till payment date) |
| Total Demand: | 1,27,68,306 |
Nature of Alleged Violations
The tax authorities have identified discrepancies in the reporting of outward supplies between GSTR-1 and outward E-way Bills. The issues also encompass input tax credit matters and reconciliation differences for the specified period.
According to MOIL's disclosure, the discrepancies primarily arise due to:
- Stock transfers between units
- Inter-unit transfers
- Capitalization of capital goods
- Timing differences in reporting
Company's Response and Impact
MOIL has clarified that the demand does not have any immediate operational impact on the company's activities. The management is currently examining the order in detail to understand the specific allegations and assess the merits of the case.
The company has indicated its intention to take appropriate legal steps, including filing an appeal within the prescribed time limit under the GST Act. This suggests that MOIL may contest the demand through the available legal remedies.
Regulatory Compliance
The disclosure was made pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, which requires listed companies to inform stock exchanges about material events that could impact their operations or financial position.
MOIL's proactive disclosure demonstrates its commitment to maintaining transparency with stakeholders regarding regulatory matters that could potentially affect the company's financial standing.
Historical Stock Returns for MOIL
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.49% | +1.38% | -4.48% | -20.41% | -10.60% | +87.95% |
How might this GST demand and potential appeal process affect MOIL's quarterly financial results and cash flow management?
Could this case set a precedent for increased GST scrutiny on other mining companies with similar inter-unit transfer operations?
What changes might MOIL implement in its GST compliance processes to prevent similar discrepancies in future financial years?


































