Mohit Industries seeks approval for ₹600 crore promoter loans at AGM
- Omnibus approval sought for ₹1,500 lakh unsecured loans each from four promoters
- Total proposed borrowing of ₹6,000 lakh equals 10.72% of FY26 consolidated turnover
- Debt-to-equity ratio projected to fall from 2.55 to 2.37 post-transaction
- Naresh Sitaram Saboo seeks reappointment as non-executive director without remuneration
- Cost auditor remuneration fixed at ₹50,000 plus taxes for FY27

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Mohit Industries will convene its 36th Annual General Meeting on September 30, 2026. The primary focus for shareholders is the ratification of material related-party transactions involving significant unsecured borrowings from promoters.
The company is seeking omnibus approval to enter into borrowing arrangements with four promoters: Narayan Sitaram Saboo, Manish Narayan Saboo, Mohit Narayan Saboo, and Naresh Sitaram Saboo. Each transaction is capped at ₹1,500 lakh, bringing the total proposed exposure to ₹6,000 lakh. These funds are designated for meeting operational cash flows and business exigencies during FY27.
Key Meeting Details
The meeting will be conducted through Video Conferencing or Other Audio Visual Means. Shareholders must ensure their holdings are registered as of the cut-off date to exercise voting rights.
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Date | September 30, 2026 |
| Time | 12:00 noon |
| Mode | VC/OAVM |
| E-voting cut-off | September 23, 2026 |
| Book Closure | September 24 to September 30, 2026 |
Related Party Transaction Structure
The proposed loans are unsecured and repayable on demand. The notice specifies that these transactions are considered material because they exceed the threshold of 10% of the annual consolidated turnover of the preceding financial year. The value of the proposed transactions represents 10.72% of the listed entity's annual consolidated turnover for FY26.
Historical data reveals varying levels of reliance on promoter funding over the last three years:
| Promoter | FY24 Borrowing (₹ lakh) | FY25 Borrowing (₹ lakh) | FY26 Borrowing (₹ lakh) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Narayan S. Saboo | 2,672.40 | 3,038.10 | 619.57 |
| Manish N. Saboo | 47.46 | 1,172.55 | 106.50 |
| Mohit N. Saboo | Nil | Nil | 475.50 |
| Naresh S. Saboo | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Narayan Sitaram Saboo remains the largest source of historical promoter credit, though the volume declined significantly in FY26 compared to FY25. Mohit Narayan Saboo emerged as a new lender in FY26, while Naresh Sitaram Saboo has no prior transaction history with the entity in the disclosed period.
Other Agenda Items
Shareholders will also vote on the reappointment of Mr. Naresh Sitaram Saboo as a Non-Executive Director. He retires by rotation and is eligible for reappointment. Mr. Saboo holds 2,68,445 equity shares in the company and does not draw a remuneration from the board.
Additionally, the meeting will approve the remuneration of M/s. Nainesh Kantliwala & Co. as Cost Auditors for FY27. The approved fee is ₹50,000 plus applicable taxes and out-of-pocket expenses.
What the Numbers Show
The debt-to-equity ratio is projected to improve slightly following these transactions. Based on the last audited financial statements, the ratio stands at 2.55 before the transaction and is expected to decrease to 2.37 after. However, the Debt Service Coverage Ratio remains unchanged at 0.68, indicating that the additional liquidity from promoter loans is intended for operational flexibility rather than immediate debt servicing capacity enhancement.
Historical Stock Returns for Mohit Industries
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.25% | -5.15% | +5.92% | -1.74% | -22.11% | +83.63% |
How might the reliance on unsecured promoter borrowings impact Mohit Industries' ability to secure institutional debt or equity financing in FY27?
Given the Debt Service Coverage Ratio remains at 0.68, what specific operational efficiencies or revenue growth strategies are management planning to implement to improve cash flow generation?
What are the potential governance risks associated with Naresh Sitaram Saboo's reappointment as a Non-Executive Director while simultaneously being a source of material related-party lending?

































