MAS Financial Services receives Crisil ESG rating of 65 (Strong)
- MAS Financial Services Ltd received a Crisil ESG rating of 65 (Strong)
- The rating was assigned voluntarily by the agency based on public data
- The company did not engage with the rating agency for this assessment
- The rating communication was revised on September 18, 2026

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
MAS Financial Services Limited has received an ESG Rating of 65 in the Strong category from CRISIL ESG Ratings & Analytics Limited. The rating was assigned on September 16, 2026, based on publicly available data.
The company clarified that it did not engage with the rating agency for this assessment. Instead, the agency voluntarily assigned the rating. The communication regarding the disclosure filed by the rating agency with the BSE Limited was received by the company on September 17, 2026.
Rating Details
The rating agency revised the communication on September 18, 2026. The specific details of the ESG rating are outlined below:
| ISIN | ESG Rating | Category | Date of Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| INE348L01012 | Crisil ESG 65 | Strong | September 16, 2026 |
This intimation was issued pursuant to Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The full intimation is available on the company’s website.
Historical Stock Returns for MAS Financial Services
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.71% | -1.87% | -5.36% | -1.93% | -8.66% | +9.13% |
How might MAS Financial Services' 'Strong' ESG rating influence its cost of capital and access to green financing instruments in the near future?
Given that the rating was assigned voluntarily by CRISIL without company engagement, will MAS Financial Services initiate a formal dialogue with the agency to validate or improve specific ESG metrics?
What competitive advantage does this ESG rating provide MAS Financial Services against peers in the Indian financial services sector regarding institutional investor preferences?


































