Insolvency Petition Filed Against Dreamfolks Services Over Alleged Default of Rs. 11.40 Crore
Travel Food Services Limited, an operational creditor, has filed an insolvency petition under Section 9 of the IBC against Dreamfolks Services Limited before NCLT, New Delhi, alleging a default of approximately Rs. 11.40 crore. The petition seeks initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the company. Dreamfolks Services has strongly disputed the claims, stating that appropriate provisions have been made in its books of accounts and that the matter does not reflect any financial stress. The company has affirmed it will take all necessary steps to protect its interests and contest the allegations.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Dreamfolks Services Limited has disclosed that an insolvency petition has been filed against it under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by Travel Food Services Limited, an operational creditor of the company. The petition has been submitted before the National Company Law Tribunal – New Delhi Bench (NCLT, New Delhi), alleging default in payment and alleged interest amount towards services rendered by the operational creditor. The disclosure was made pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, dated May 16, 2026.
Petition Details
The petition seeks initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Dreamfolks Services. The key details of the petition are outlined below:
| Parameter: | Details |
|---|---|
| Petitioner: | Travel Food Services Limited |
| Type of Creditor: | Operational Creditor |
| Legal Provision: | Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 |
| Forum: | National Company Law Tribunal – New Delhi Bench (NCLT, New Delhi) |
| Alleged Default Amount: | Approx. Rs. 11.40 crore |
| Nature of Claim: | Default in payment and alleged interest for services rendered |
| Relief Sought: | Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) |
| Disclosure Date: | May 16, 2026 |
Company's Response
Dreamfolks Services has strongly disputed the claims made in the petition. The company stated that the alleged amount of approximately Rs. 11.40 crore is contested, and that appropriate provisions, as considered necessary, have already been made in its books of accounts. The company further asserted that it continues to maintain a strong and healthy financial position, and that the matter is not indicative of any financial stress relating to the company.
The company has stated it will take all necessary and appropriate steps to protect its interests and object to the allegations in the matter. Key points from the company's position include:
- The claims are strongly disputed by the company.
- Appropriate provisions have been made in the books of accounts.
- The company maintains a strong and healthy financial position.
- The matter is not indicative of any financial stress.
- The company will take all necessary steps to protect its interests and contest the allegations.
Disclosure and Transparency
The disclosure was made in the interest of transparency, governance, and investor awareness, as stated by the company. Dreamfolks Services has indicated that further updates, if any, will be duly intimated to the stock exchanges. The intimation was signed by Harshit Gupta, Company Secretary and Compliance Officer of Dreamfolks Services Limited.
Historical Stock Returns for Dreamfolks Services
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.00% | -8.54% | -9.91% | -36.84% | -71.13% | -83.55% |
If the NCLT admits the insolvency petition, how could the initiation of CIRP impact Dreamfolks Services' existing contracts with airports and airlines, and what would be the cascading effect on its core lounge access business?
How might this insolvency petition influence investor sentiment and institutional confidence in Dreamfolks Services, particularly given its relatively recent listing on Indian stock exchanges?
Could this dispute signal broader financial tensions within the airport services and travel hospitality ecosystem in India, and are other operational creditors in the sector facing similar payment delays?


































