Imp Powers Q1 Results: Revenue up 34% YoY, net loss widens
Imp Powers Limited posted a standalone net loss of ₹78.21 lakh in Q1FY27, a significant improvement from the ₹199.70 lakh loss in Q1FY25, as revenue surged 34% YoY to ₹3,878.44 lakh. Statutory auditors issued a qualified opinion due to unresolved legacy receivables and pending asset impairments from the CIRP process. The Board re-appointed Naveen Kumar Singh as Whole-time Director and Shilpa Shah as Secretarial Auditor.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Imp Powers Limited reported a standalone net loss of ₹78.21 lakh for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 (Q1FY27), compared to a loss of ₹199.70 lakh in the corresponding period of FY25. The company’s revenue from operations increased by 34% year-on-year to ₹3,878.44 lakh from ₹171.18 lakh in Q1FY25. This operational improvement came despite statutory auditors issuing a qualified opinion on the unaudited financial results, citing significant uncertainties regarding legacy trade receivables and asset valuations stemming from the company’s prior Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
The Board of Directors approved the standalone and consolidated financial results at its meeting held on August 08, 2026, in compliance with Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. Alongside the results, the Board re-appointed Ms. Shilpa Shah as the Secretarial Auditor for Financial Year 2026–27 based on the recommendation of the Audit Committee. The Board also approved the re-appointment of Mr. Naveen Kumar Singh as Whole-time Director for a one-year term effective August 08, 2026, subject to shareholder approval at the ensuing General Meeting.
Financial Performance Overview
| Metric | Q1FY27 (₹ Lakh) | Q1FY25 (₹ Lakh) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | 3,878.44 | 171.18 | +2,166% |
| Total Income | 4,076.25 | 171.48 | +2,275% |
| Total Expenses | 4,097.05 | 360.37 | +1,037% |
| Net Loss | (78.21) | (199.70) | -61% |
Standalone total income rose to ₹4,076.25 lakh from ₹171.48 lakh in Q1FY25, driven primarily by the surge in revenue from operations. However, total expenses also increased significantly to ₹4,097.05 lakh from ₹360.37 lakh, largely due to changes in inventories of finished goods and work-in-progress, which added ₹1,940.60 lakh to costs. Other income stood at ₹197.82 lakh, down from ₹0.30 lakh in the previous year’s quarter. The consolidated net loss attributable to shareholders was ₹77.45 lakh, compared to ₹200.19 lakh in Q1FY25.
Auditor’s Qualified Opinion
Statutory auditors BJS & Associates highlighted several material uncertainties in their limited review report. A substantial portion of trade receivables remains outstanding since before the commencement of the CIRP, with no expected credit loss (ECL) recognized against these balances. The auditors noted that the carrying value of these receivables may not comply with Ind AS 109 requirements, potentially leading to an overstatement of assets and understatement of losses.
Additionally, the company has not performed impairment assessments on its assets despite prolonged suspension of production activities during the CIRP and subsequent liquidation process. The auditors stated they could not determine if any impairment loss is required under Ind AS 36. Furthermore, deferred tax expenses and liabilities have not been recognized as per Ind AS 12, and actuarial valuations for employee benefit obligations remain incomplete.
What the Numbers Show
The dramatic increase in revenue from ₹171.18 lakh to ₹3,878.44 lakh signals a resumption of commercial operations following the change in management via the e-auction process. Electrify Energy Pvt Ltd, in consortium with Mr. Rakesh R Shah, paid ₹78 crore as the bid amount for the company. However, the distribution of sale proceeds remains incomplete pending final legal resolutions, including an appeal by STCI Finance Limited in the Supreme Court. Consequently, the company has not yet accounted for the consequential write-backs or write-offs of relevant balances, leaving the balance sheet heavily impacted by legacy items that have not been fully reconciled or impaired.
How will the resolution of the STCI Finance Limited appeal in the Supreme Court impact the final distribution of sale proceeds and Imp Powers' ability to clear legacy liabilities?
What specific measures is management planning to implement to address the statutory auditors' concerns regarding unimpaired assets and non-compliance with Ind AS 109 and Ind AS 36?
Given the significant rise in inventory costs, how does Electrify Energy plan to manage working capital and ensure sustainable profitability in subsequent quarters?

























