Franco-Nevada disputes Burkina Faso court ruling on Karma Mine stream
Franco-Nevada Corporation is disputing a Burkina Faso court ruling dated June 16, 2026, that seeks to nullify its stream agreement for the Karma Mine. The company contends the agreement is governed by Ontario law and is actively pursuing legal remedies in Ontario and other jurisdictions to vacate the judgement against Riverstone Karma SA and its parent, Néré Mining SA.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Franco-Nevada Corporation is challenging a local court decision in Burkina Faso that purports to nullify the stream agreement related to the Karma Mine. The company stated on June 16, 2026, that it believes the judgement is not valid and is seeking to have it vacated. The dispute centers on a stream agreement issued by Riverstone Karma SA, which Franco-Nevada asserts is governed by Ontario law.
The company is pursuing its own legal remedies in Ontario and other jurisdictions in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions in the agreement. Franco-Nevada is taking action against Riverstone Karma SA, its parent Néré Mining SA, and other relevant affiliates to protect its legal rights.
Franco-Nevada Corporation is a gold-focused royalty and streaming company with a diversified portfolio of cash-flow producing assets. The company is debt-free and uses its free cash flow to expand its portfolio and pay dividends. It trades under the symbol FNV on both the Toronto and New York stock exchanges.
Legal Dispute Overview
The following table outlines the key entities involved in the dispute:
| Entity | Role |
|---|---|
| Franco-Nevada Corporation | Stream holder |
| Riverstone Karma SA | Counterparty |
| Néré Mining SA | Parent company of Riverstone Karma SA |
The company has emphasized that the stream agreement remains valid under Ontario law and is committed to enforcing its rights through available legal channels.
How might this legal dispute impact Franco-Nevada's future streaming agreements in politically unstable regions?
What are the potential financial implications for Franco-Nevada if the court decision is not vacated?
Could this dispute affect Franco-Nevada's dividend policy or free cash flow allocation?






















