Eveready Industries India Limited receives IGST penalty order

1 min read     Updated on 26 May 2026, 02:38 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Anirudha BScanX News Team
AI Summary

Eveready Industries India Limited received a demand order from the State Tax Officer, State Goods & Services Tax, Haridwar, Uttarakhand, imposing a penalty of Rs.12,66,202. The order, dated May 24, 2026, was issued under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) regulations. The company stated that the penalty arose due to a truck seizure caused by a minor typographical error in the E-Way Bill for financial year 2026-27. The company received the order on May 25, 2026, via download from the GSTN portal. According to the disclosure, the order was passed as DRC-07 Ref. No. ZD050526011223Y. The penalty relates to actions taken by the GST Authority regarding the contravention. Eveready Industries confirmed that it will file a necessary appeal with the appellate authority against the order. The company clarified that there is no impact on its financial, operational, or other activities as a result of this demand order.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
41282039

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Eveready Industries India Limited received a demand order from the State Tax Officer, State Goods & Services Tax, Haridwar, Uttarakhand, imposing a penalty of Rs.12,66,202. The order, dated May 24, 2026, was issued under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) regulations. The company stated that the penalty arose due to a truck seizure caused by a minor typographical error in the E-Way Bill for financial year 2026-27.

The company received the order on May 25, 2026, via download from the GSTN portal. According to the disclosure, the order was passed as DRC-07 Ref. No. ZD050526011223Y. The penalty relates to actions taken by the GST Authority regarding the contravention.

eveready industries confirmed that it will file a necessary appeal with the appellate authority against the order. The company clarified that there is no impact on its financial, operational, or other activities as a result of this demand order.

The following table details the specifics of the order and the company's response:

Sl. No. Particulars Description
1. Name of the authority State Tax Officer, State Goods & Services Tax, Haridwar, Uttarakhand
2. Nature and details of the action(s) taken or order(s) passed Demand Order in DRC-07 Ref. No. ZD050526011223Y dated 24-05-2026 for penalty of IGST of Rs.12,66,202/-
3. Date of receipt of direction or order 25.05.2026 at 10.30 a.m. on download from GSTN portal
4. Details of the violation(s) / contravention(s) committed The Order has been passed by the GST Authority on 24-05-2026 for financial year 2026-27, on account of Truck seizure due to minor typographical error in the E-Way Bill
5. Impact on financial, operation or other activities The Company will file necessary appeal with the appellate authority in this regard. There is no impact on financial, operational or other activities of the Company

Historical Stock Returns for Eveready Industries

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
+1.47%+0.08%+0.36%-5.03%+1.95%-0.97%

How will the legal costs and management time required to appeal this penalty affect Eveready's operational efficiency?

Could this incident trigger a review of internal compliance processes to prevent similar E-Way Bill errors in the future?

What is the likelihood of the appellate authority overturning the penalty given the minor nature of the typographical error?

Eveready Industries secures HC stay on Rs 7.11 cr order

1 min read     Updated on 26 May 2026, 12:11 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Suketu GScanX News Team
AI Summary

Eveready Industries India has successfully obtained an interim stay from the Delhi High Court against a May 15, 2026 order by the Patiala House Courts requiring payment of Rs 7.11 crores in damages to UCO Bank. The dispute concerns the alleged unauthorized occupation of 5,471 sq. feet at the UCO Bank Building in New Delhi. The company confirmed that the financial liability does not materially impact its operations.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
40679859

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Eveready Industries India has secured a stay from the Delhi High Court on an order passed by the Hon'ble Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, which had directed the company to pay damages estimated at approximately Rs. 7.11 crores to UCO Bank. The company filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi seeking interim relief in the matter. On May 22, 2026, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi passed an interim order staying the impugned order of the District Court, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.

Court Order Details

The proceedings relate to the alleged unauthorized occupation of a portion measuring 5,471 sq. feet at UCO Bank Building, Parliament Street, New Delhi – 110001. The original order, dated May 15, 2026, was disclosed by the company on May 18, 2026. The key details of the original court order are summarized below:

Parameter: Details
Court: Hon'ble Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
Order Date: May 15, 2026
Property in Dispute: UCO Bank Building, Parliament Street, New Delhi – 110001
Area Under Dispute: 5,471 sq. feet
Damages Payable: Rs. 7.11 crores (excluding interest)
Payable To: UCO Bank
Disclosure Date: May 18, 2026

Delhi High Court Intervention

Following the district court's order, Eveready Industries moved the Delhi High Court. The High Court has granted a stay on the ruling, providing the company temporary relief from the damages order. Eveready Industries had clarified that the damages amount of Rs. 7.11 crores does not have any material impact on its operations.

Regulatory Disclosure

The intimation was submitted to the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd, BSE Limited, and The Calcutta Stock Exchange Limited in compliance with Regulation 30 of the SEBI Listing Regulations. The disclosure was signed by Shampa Ghosh Ray, Company Secretary of Eveready Industries India Limited.

Historical Stock Returns for Eveready Industries

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
+1.47%+0.08%+0.36%-5.03%+1.95%-0.97%

What is the expected timeline for the final hearing of the writ petition in the Delhi High Court?

How might the legal costs associated with this prolonged dispute impact Eveready's financial reserves?

Does Eveready Industries have a contingency plan if the stay is lifted and the damages order is reinstated?

More News on Eveready Industries

1 Year Returns:+1.95%