Ceenik Exports pays ₹5.1 lakh MCA compounding fee for compliance default
- Ceenik Exports paid ₹5.10 lakh as compounding fee to MCA
- Default related to non-appointment of Company Secretary from 2016 to 2018
- Company contributed ₹1.60 lakh; officers paid the remainder
- No material impact on business operations or financial stability reported

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Ceenik Exports (India) Ltd has paid ₹5.10 lakh to settle a compounding fee levied by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA). This payment resolves a regulatory default regarding the non-appointment of a Company Secretary during specific financial years.
The final order was issued by the Office of the Regional Director, Western Region-I, Mumbai, under Section 441 of the Companies Act, 2013. The default pertained to non-compliance with Section 203 of the Act, which mandates the appointment of Key Management Personnel, specifically a Company Secretary.
Details of the Regulatory Default
The violation occurred during the period from September 18, 2016, to November 1, 2018. The company failed to appoint a Company Secretary during this timeframe, leading to regulatory scrutiny and subsequent compounding proceedings. The order was dated September 23, 2026, and received by the company on September 30, 2026.
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Authority | Regional Director, Western Region-I, MCA |
| Nature of Order | Final Order under Section 441 |
| Default Period | Sept 18, 2016 to Nov 1, 2018 |
| Total Compounding Fee | ₹5,10,000 |
| Company's Share | ₹1,60,000 |
Impact on Operations
The aggregate compounding fee of ₹5.10 lakh was fully paid by the company and its officers in default. Of this total amount, the company itself contributed ₹1.60 lakh. In its disclosure to the BSE, Ceenik Exports stated that there is no material impact on its business operations or financial stability resulting from this order.
What the Numbers Show
The total penalty of ₹5.10 lakh covers a two-year period of non-compliance (2016–2018), averaging approximately ₹2.55 lakh per year for the entire entity and its officers. The company’s direct contribution of ₹1.60 lakh represents roughly 31% of the total liability, indicating that the remaining burden was borne by individual officers in default. This allocation suggests a shared responsibility model for the governance lapse, though the absolute financial magnitude remains immaterial relative to typical corporate operational costs.
Historical Stock Returns for Ceenik Exports
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.73% | +3.57% | -1.92% | -20.39% | -43.27% | 0.0% |
How will the appointment of a new Company Secretary influence Ceenik Exports' long-term corporate governance ratings?
Are there other pending regulatory defaults or compliance gaps for Ceenik Exports that could trigger further MCA scrutiny?
Will this resolution prompt Ceenik Exports to revise its internal compliance protocols to prevent future Section 203 violations?


































