Balmer Lawrie appoints KPMG as internal auditor for FY27-29
- Balmer Lawrie appoints KPMG Assurance and Consulting Services LLP as internal auditor
- The term covers FY27, FY28, and FY29 subject to yearly review
- Board approved the appointment at a meeting resumed on September 16, 2026

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. has appointed KPMG Assurance and Consulting Services LLP as its internal auditor for the financial years 2026-27, 2027-28, and 2028-29. The appointment is subject to yearly review.
The Board of Directors approved the engagement at an adjourned meeting that resumed on September 16, 2026. The original meeting had commenced on September 15, 2026.
Appointment Details
The company disclosed the appointment under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The term covers three fiscal years with mandatory annual reviews.
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Auditor | KPMG Assurance and Consulting Services LLP |
| Term | FY27, FY28, and FY29 |
| Review Clause | Subject to yearly review |
| Approval Date | September 16, 2026 |
Kavita Bhavsar, Company Secretary and Compliance Officer, signed the disclosure. The firm will conduct technology-driven, risk-based internal audits and Internal Financial Controls assessments across major Indian metros.
KPMG Assurance and Consulting Services LLP is a primary member firm of the KPMG global network. It operates as an Indian Limited Liability Partnership.
Historical Stock Returns for Balmer Lawrie & Co
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.30% | -8.10% | -6.53% | -1.83% | -31.23% | +16.70% |
How might KPMG's technology-driven audit approach impact Balmer Lawrie's operational efficiency and cost structure over the next three years?
What specific internal financial control weaknesses or risk areas is Balmer Lawrie likely targeting with this multi-year engagement?
Could the mandatory yearly review clause lead to increased scrutiny or potential changes in auditor strategy if performance metrics are not met?


































