Apple seeks court-ordered settlement talks with Epic Games over App Store fees
Apple seeks a court-ordered settlement conference with Epic Games to resolve ongoing disputes over App Store fees and external payment rules. The filing follows a Supreme Court decision rejecting Apple's appeal against a contempt finding related to its non-compliance with a 2021 injunction. Apple had proposed a 15% commission on external payments, which Epic rejected as exceeding legal limits set by the Ninth Circuit.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) has moved to force settlement negotiations with Epic Games, filing a motion Thursday to compel a court-ordered conference before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. The move aims to resolve remaining disputes over App Store rules and fees without further litigation.
The filing comes after the US Supreme Court rejected Apple's request to pause lower-court proceedings while it considers an appeal against a contempt finding by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. That finding stemmed from Apple's failure to comply with a 2021 injunction requiring the company to allow developers to direct users to external payment systems.
Commission Dispute Details
Apple had previously sought to impose a 27% commission on purchases made through external payment systems, triggering the contempt dispute. Separately, the company submitted a proposal outlining a framework where it could collect commissions of up to 15% on transactions processed through alternative payment systems in the US.
Epic immediately objected to this proposal, arguing that the proposed fees exceed what the Ninth Circuit has indicated Apple can charge for external purchases. The current settlement motion is distinct from the commission proposal; it does not present a specific offer but asks the court to facilitate confidential negotiations between the two sides.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence in commission proposals highlights the core friction point: Apple's proposed 15% fee for external transactions versus Epic's stance that such rates violate Ninth Circuit guidance. This gap underscores the difficulty of reconciling Apple's revenue model for alternative payment processing with judicial limits on platform fees, suggesting that any settlement will require significant compromise on the effective take rate for third-party transactions.
The case originates from Epic’s 2020 lawsuit challenging Apple’s control over iOS in-app payments. While Apple largely won the underlying case, the subsequent injunction mandated changes to its payment policies. Apple and Epic attorneys discussed the proposed settlement conference on August 11, but Epic had not agreed to the request prior to the filing.
How might a court-mandated settlement conference impact Apple's overall App Store revenue model if the 15% external payment fee is rejected?
Could this forced negotiation set a legal precedent that other tech giants like Google or Microsoft must follow regarding in-app purchase commissions?
What are the potential risks for Epic Games if they refuse to participate in the confidential settlement negotiations proposed by Apple?

































